Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

DRAFT AGENDA

...

Community: Eric Murray Thorsten Lohmar Randy LevensalorBen Hepworth  Akos Hunyadi Rafal Artych Mahesh Chapalamadugu Joachim Dahlgren Ramesh Shanmugasundaram Toshi Wakayama Syed Rehman Ria Das Konstantinos Fragkos Ben Hepworth Jose Luis Urien Pinedo 

Agenda

  • Antitrust Policy
  • Review of previous meeting minutes
  • Overall Topics
    • Device object definition discussion
  • Regular Topics
    • Open Pull Requests
    • New Issues
    • Issues relevant for v0.11.0
  • Any Other Topics

...

  • GitHub Teams @camaraproject/quality-on-demand_codeowners and @camaraproject/quality-on-demand_maintainers available
    • Please use them to notify especially the Maintainers about PRs which should be reviewed
    • Note: you can add the Maintainer team also as a reviewer ... but GitHub will drop it from the list as soon one Maintainer has done a review "on behalf" of the team. On the positive side all Maintainers have then got a notification of the PR and that they can/should have a look on it
  • Discussion Commonalities/issues/171: Revise the device object definition to simplify it 
    • See also the issue opened within QoD: https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/300
    • Commonalities is waiting for feedback
    • Discussion:
      • Device object will be made optional, but we need to document the cases in which it can be omitted by the API consumer, and it which cases the additional from device object is needed
      • NAI might be needed for IoT device cases (having not MSISDN assigned) - but that is a general decision for the project, not specific to QoD

Open Pull Requests

...

Issues relevant for v0.11.0

...