DRAFT MINUTES
Attendees
Organization | Name | |
Orange | ||
Charter Communications |
| |
CableLabs |
| |
TelefonicaJorge Garcia Hospital | ||
VodafoneEric Murray Kevin Smith | ||
Ericsson | ||
AT&T | ||
T-Mobile US | ||
KDDIYusuke Nakano | ||
Slagen |
| |
Nokia |
| |
China Telecom | ||
ZTE |
| |
KPN | ||
GSMA | Reg Cox Mark Cornall | |
Centilion | ||
Chunghwa Telecom |
| |
Deutsche Telekom |
| |
MTN |
| |
China MobileHaojie Li Keguang He zhangruqian | ||
Verizon |
Agenda Proposal
Approval of minutes of last conf. call
Recent Updates & Recap
Review of Action Points
Discussion
OGW Drop #4 APIs: #35 (5G New Calling), #50 (Device Management), #63 (IMEI Fraud), #83 #85 #86 #87 (Model as a Service), #91 (Fixed lines in Device Location APIs), #93 (Line Eligibility for Carrier Billing API)
Other APIs: #17 (Consent and Measurement), #23 (Carrier Wholesale Pricing), #24 (Steering of Roaming Information), #66 (network Info), #68 (Consent URL), #89 (IP High-throughput Elastic Network)
Governance: #4 (Structures and roles, RACI, Maintainers initiative)
Closing Issues
#20 (Best Interconnection), #22 (Capability and Runtime Restrictions), #19 (Device Quality Indicator), #28 (Device Data Volume), #18 (Receive SMS), #54 (Number Recycling), #70 (Quality by Design), #34 (Shutdown Service Status), #41 (Telco Scoring), #60 (Dedicated Networks), #66 (network Info), #68 (Consent URL)
AoB
Q&A
Antitrust Policy
The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LinusFoundation.
|
 |
...
Issue # | Company | Summary | Status Update | |||||||
T-Mobile US | Capability and Runtime Restrictions The API template is available in PR#74 | It was accepted by the TSC to treat this as a new API Initial YAML files to be included in the API TEMPLATE MEETING UPDATE:
| ||||||||
Totogi | New Proposal: Receive SMS The API template is available in PR#75 |
Seems to fit in the SMS as a new scope enhancement The issue is not eligible to be closed yet. ACTION: Ricardo to formally proceed with the scope enhancement os the SMS group MEETING UPDATE:
| Deutsche Telekom | Noel proposed Device Status subgroup to integrate their APIs within Noel's. Noel to make the proposal to the API Backlog and provide update Two proposals Issue 19 and 28 would be integrating within the Device Status subproject The subgroup people is okay with this The issue is not eligible to be closed yet. Move to TSC, check wether there is support for this API (Interested parties provide comments in the Issue, Vodafone committed and a third supporter is being queried) Both issue 19 and 28 to the DeviceStatus family and separate repositories (deviceStatus) → Device Quality Indicator DECISION formal agreement from the Device Status subgroup is required. To be treated in next meeting (Device Status) DECISION There is agreement Orange, DT and VDF, next backlog meeting there should be the outcome for this issue Pending to confirm codeowner/maintainers for repo creation, email sent
MEETING UPDATE:
| Deutsche Telekom | New API Proposal: Device Data Volume New template in PR#39 | Move to TSC, check wether there is support for this API (Interested parties provide comments in the Issue) Both issue 19 and 28 to the DeviceStatus family and separate repositories (deviceStatus) → Device Data Volume DECISION formal agreement from the Device Status subgroup is required. To be treated in next meeting (Device Status) DECISION There is agreement Vonage, DT and VDF, next backlog meeting there should be the outcome for this issue Pending to confirm codeowner/maintainers for repo creation, email sent MEETING UPDATE:
| |||
China Unicom | New API Proposal: Shutdown ServiceStatus (SubscriptionStatus) The API template is available in PR#32 | DECISION Separate Repos should be created but same family (KYC) in order to have coordination meeting Pending to confirm codeowner/maintainers for repo creation, email sent Included in today's TSC approval. MEETING UPDATE:
| ||||||||
KDDI | Number Recycling The API template is available 55 | Pending Codeowners and maintainers (requested in comment) MEETING UPDATE:
| ||||||||
Cablelabs | New API proposal - Quality by Design The API template is available #71 | Proposal is that QbD be a scope enhancement to Connectivity Insights Will likely require new API, hence new repository required QdD supporters will attend Connectivity Insights meeting next week to finalise proposal Awaiting outcome of Connectivity Insights meeting before finalising if new repository required
DECISION :
MEETING UPDATE:
| ||||||||
Telefonica | New API Proposal: Telco Scoring The API template is available PR#42 Input from OGW Drop 4 | Presented slides: API-Overview-TelcoScore.pptx The API seems to not fit within KYC and new sg should be created. Support is required, feel free Scoring can be calculated both with any user registered in the telco. Less information means less scoring, Algorithm may be different for each of the implementators (MNO) ACTION: Toshi validate if This API may fit within KYC API family → The issue was raised but still under discussion →(Toshi's proposal 20240627) In API Backlog 20240613 meeting, Jorge TEF and Toshi KDDI agreed that the API does not fit within the existing KYC-SP. Then, in KYC-SP 20240625 meeting, that was shared within KYC-SP and there was no objection. Closed. Pending meeting with DT to seek for support. ACTION Noel to come back to TEF MEETING UPDATE: Telefonica manage to find the support of VDF (Kevin confirmed in the chat also) and DT if no objections. The name should be readressed, Jorge was prposing Telco Index to avoid using legal restrictions for using words "Credit" and "Scoring". Nick propose Telco Trust → Discussing this in the issue ofline. Tanja (note in chat on behalf of Release Mgmt): Reminder to not use Telco specific terms in API names. To avoid: Telco, operator, CSP, subscriber, customer, EMEI, UE, etc. MEETING UPDATE:
| ||||||||
Ericsson | New API proposal-Dedicated Networks The API template is available PR#59 | Thorsten presented the proposal: Material here  There have been a similar work in a TMF API. Pierre offered himself to Thorsten to reach up DECISION New repo/subproject to be created and a family that groups both NSB and DN ACTION Telefonica providing comments this afternoon and moving to TSC → Action complete Comments from TEF addressed in Issue PR#60 ACTION: Eric to check with Miranda in Issue PR#60 if her preference is for separate sub-projects, or for DN to join NSB sub-project No response regarding this, pending to response MEETING UPDATE: Discussion regarding separate or not separate repos. Telefonica supports having separate repos but having the conversation in the same forum as part of a unified family DECISION: Move to tsc taking care of this comment and expecting the administrative work to be clarified there. Someone for NSB group (Huawei, China etc.) should be connecting tsc that day at least to be aware of this ACTION: Thorsten to reach up NSB group by it mailing list proposing to join the TSC meeting. Next TSC meetings: 19/09/24 at 16:00 CEST / 14:00 UTC / 07:00 PST 03/10/24 at 10:00 CEST / 08:00 UTC / 01:00 PST MEETING UPDATE:
|
...
Proposal to extend meeting half hour (1:30 total) to accomodate all new APIs and also the track of existing.
@all to comment
Next Backlog conf. call: 10th October, 10-11 CET/UTC+2.
...