Date
Status:
| Status | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Final Date for Comments:
Agenda
Antitrust Policy
Review of Issues 51, 59
Minutes
Management of WG
Meetings scheduled updated to UTC Time 11:00 - 12:00 (12:00 - 13:00 CET, 13:00 - 14:00 CEST).
Consolidated Work
Issues Review
Issue | Who | Status | Notes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/16 |
| No feeback received yet from Business side.
10/OCT: TEF indicates this topic is still on-hold. Will ping Business durign this quarter 24/OCT: So far Keep this ON-HOLD. | |||||||
https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/51 |
| Not providing “plain” phoneNumber as input criteria for blockchain retrieval 10/OCT: DT indicates we have to think in a confident solution. TEF indicates not think in detail so far but it will do. 24/OCT: Proposal presented by TEF to be reviewed. Explained during the meeting. Will be checked offline and if alll fine, it would be a way forward to fix the issue. 06/NOV: PR https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/pull/60 raised to cover this Issue | |||||||
https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/52 |
| Enforcement about blockchainPublicAddress really belongs to the phoneNumber indicated (i.e, the user that owns the phoneNumber) 10/OCT: DT indicates we have to design a solution that provides security and reliability. In the past was commented about sending of OTP but not also sure that could be a good way. 24/OCT: TEF commented this need deep thinking, as the constrain is how to guarentee the blockcahin is associated to the user whose phoneNumber is used to the bound. DT acknowledges this and indicates the topic would be to ensure how the user has control over the blockchain in a usable manner (An option would be to create a new wallet for each binding but that was not very usable from User’s point of view). DT and TEF will talk offline about this topic. | |||||||
https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/57 |
| Issue raised from former meeting in order to adapt API Specification to Commonalities Related PR raised: Approved by DT (Georgios Papadopoulos (Unlicensed)). Will be given one more week to provide comments if any and, if no other topics, will be merged on 31/10. Intention is to have baseline API Spec to work on for the next release. | |||||||
https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/59 | Aleph Zero |
| Proposal by Aleph Zero to consider their blockchain as part of BlockChain Networks | ||||||
AoB | WG |
Next Meetings:
On , 11:00 - 12:00 UTC Time (12:00 - 13:00 CET, 13:00 - 14:00 CEST) - Meetings Link