Community Attendees:
Thorsten Lohmar , Rajat Kandoi , Barath K , @Peter Kovacs, Surajj Jaggernath , @Stefano Brivio, Masaharu Hattori , steve.vickers , @Hubert Przybysz, @Fadime Demirer
Community Attendees:
LF Staff:
Agenda
Antitrust Policy
Action Items Review
Agreement of last minutes (Link)
Action Items Review
Issue at CAMARA Governance (Issue #172): Verbal answer during the meeting: Approval by one CodeOwner (who is not the contributor of the PR) unblocks the merging. Still, agreement according to the CAMARA process description is needed before merging.
Issue #16 is closed. Issue #17 (Correlating a Dedicated Network resource within a subsequent IoT Data Transfer Activation API call) is open
Issues and Pull Requests
Issue #11: Usage Scenarios for Dedicated Networks
Pull Request #12: Description of Usage Scenarios for the Dedicated Networks API
Issue #10: API Design Requirements
Minutes
Topic 1
CommentsReview of Action Points:
Thorsten: Created PR in Governance (#172) and discussed in TSC / API Backlog. One CODEOWNER needs to approve before it can be merged (other than the Contributor). CODEOWNERS automatically added to review. Maintainers need to be added manually.
Rajat: No update on images. Request to leave open.
PR #12 and PR #15
Merged in the meeting. Agreed that since they are living documents - changes in future versions are to be expected. Members agree that having some info public is good to make progress.
New PR #18 - Initial API Proposal
Megalinter issue - seems like it is more restrictive.
Thorsten walked through the slide deck (no notes made)
Action items
- Need to check Megalinter rules - why is it more restrictive? Who maintains the rules? (Rajat Kandoi , Thorsten Lohmar )