Community Attendees:
Santiago Troncoso (Quobis)
Tsuyoshi Takakura(NTT)
Pradeep Achar
Community Attendees:
Rafal Artych (Deutsche Telekom AG)
LF Staff:
Agenda
Antitrust Policy
PRs to review:
#53 - Notification compliance
Issues to discuss:
#15 - Notification events
#25 - Emergency call support for BYON
#50 - Spring25 Documentation requirements
#51 - Spring25 API requirements
#52 - Branded Calls impact in WebRTC API
Minutes
PRs to review (link):
#53 - Notification compliance
Code to be reviewed: remove protocols not supported
All agreed, latest commit already removes it
Review of commonalities compliance
Currently on 0.4.0. Relase 0.5.0 for Commonalities to be relased on March’25, most significan changes ready for Dec’24
Comments provided by Rafal Artych at the PR in order to get ahead of changes
Probably RACM and CallHandling APIs require review for this 0.5.0 release. We will have time to review them.
Discussion:
registration
andsession
events types. To be replaced by:SessionInvitationNotification
: When a new WebRTC session is requested (e.g.: new incoming call)SessionStatusNotification
: When a live WebRTC session is updated (e.g.: Trasnsition from progressing to ringing)End of IMS subscriber registration or administrative session revoke can be notified using the common
subscription-ends
eventNo new events definitions seems to be needed.
Anybody is really happy with the
webrtc-events
name 🙃 , it is just a temp name. To be changed soon, before merging.
Issues to discuss (link):
#15 - Notification events
To be discussed on PR #53 review
#25 - Emergency call support for BYON
On hold
#50 - Spring25 Documentation requirements
Present where releases are documented (Release tracker) WebRTC API Release Tracking
Telco terms to be reviewed
#51 - Spring25 API requirements
Test definition required
Status colour Red title TODO
#52 - Branded Calls impact in WebRTC API
Refactor to enhancement request for branded apps
#54 - Detected
SessionStatusNotification
andSessionInvitationNotification
schemas not in useSchemas are defined, not linked on the yaml. The functionality is expected to be included as event notifications
Other points
Suggested to review documentation to do not include telco terms if the doc is not telco focused.
There is a lack of developer documentation included on the RACM and CallHandling APIs embedded on the yaml.
Action items
- #53 - Keep working on comms fixes and event re-definition
- #51 - Tests still needed