...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
CAMARA Population Density Data API - Follow-up meeting #7 - 2024-05-28
May 08th, 2024
Attendees
Name | Company |
---|---|
Sachin Kumar | Vodafone |
Gregory Liokumovich | Ericsson |
Violeta Gonzalez Fernandez | Telefonica |
Jorge Garcia | Telefonica |
...
Population Density Data API minutes: https://wikilf-camaraproject.camaraprojectatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/CAM/Population+Density+Data+API+Minutes
Agenda
- Approval of previous meeting minutes #6 and meeting agenda
- Open issues and PRs
- Issues: #7 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #20
- PR #19 #21
- Initial algorithm proposal review
- Timeline and next steps
- AoB
Open Issues & PRs
Issue#7 | Telefonica | Default and limit values for the API Characteristics |
Issue#12 | Telefonica | Discussion on API algorithm - Initial proposal |
Issue#13 | Ericsson | API time format |
Issue#14 | Ericsson | Exposed data - Population vs density |
Issue#15 | Ericsson | Including redoc and swagger editor link in readme |
Issue#16 | Orange | Area format alignement |
Issue#20 | Orange | Async operation proposal |
PR#19 | Telefonica | Modification of readme |
PR#21 | Telefonica | Solves #6 #7 #10 #13 #15 #20 (open) |
Approval of previous meeting minutes & documentation (1)
→ Approved
API proposal review (2)
Different discussions raised during the API review:
Issue#7 Open discussion on default and limit values for the API characteristics:
Issue to be closed after "bigger area than supported" error is included in the code (solved) Closed
Ericsson: Time format alignment with commonalities, supporting RFC instead of ISO
Issue to be closed after RFC format is included in the code (solved)
Issue Closed
Ericsson: Response content should follow the expected as in the API name, it is, density instead of population count
...
TEF: Mainly used in stable versions when a release is launched, in any case it's proposed in PR#19
Issue to be closed after swagger editors links are added to readme (solved)
Issue Closed and PR merged
Orange: Align location area format with other APIs of CAMARA
Issue to be closed after location format is included in the code (solved)
Issue Closed
Orange: Proposal and alternative for implementation of async mechanism in the API response
...
Discussion: Not clear about best option. Current one, specified in #21, is focused on callback mechanism. To be confirmed offline
AP: Confirm strategy on the proposal to first focus on current callback mechanism for this version, adapted to any modification of Commonalities Subscription mechanism.
Solving Issue#15
PR closed
Solves #6 #7 #10 #13 & #15. #20 still open about details, also to be aligned with async/subscription mechanism in commonalities
To be merged when closing Issue#20
Initial algorithm proposal (3)
Population Density API - Algorithm.pdf
→ To provide feedback
Question: how to proceed?
PR to be opennedopened for further discussion on documentation.
AoB (4)
Usage Authentication/security discussion opened around the usage of 2-3 legegd legged access tokens is raised. Anonimous data API so ...for this API(s). Discussion to be opened in #24
Discussion Summary
Issue#7 | Default and limit values for the API Characteristics | To be closedClosed |
Issue#12 | Discussion on API algorithm | Follow discussion in Github, once PR open |
Issue#13 | API time format | To be closedClosed |
Issue#14 | Exposed data - Population vs density | Continue offline discussionAgreed to include people/km2 as format, definition discussion to be treated in #23 |
Issue#15 | Including redoc and swagger editor link in readme | To be closedClosed |
Issue#16 | Area format alignment | To be closedClosed |
PR#19 | Modification of readme | To be reviewed and mergedMerged |
Issue#20 | Async operation proposal | First option proposed in PR#21, still to discuss offline |
PR#21 | Solves #6 #7 #10 #13 #15 #20 (open) | To be reviewed and merged |
Issue#23 | Response parameters definitions | (NEW) to be treated offline |
AoB | Discussion on authentication management | To be reviewed in separate issue(NEW) to be treated offline → Issue#24 |
Next steps
- Feedback on algorithm proposal→ Follow-up meeting #8
- Close async mechanism #8
- Parameter definitions #8
- RC API spec agreement → Follow-up meeting #8
...