Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Next »

DRAFT AGENDA

Attendees & Representation

TSC Members may indicate their attendance by marking an X in the column to the right.

Community members may use @name tag to mark their attendance below the table. 

RepresentativeOrganizationRole

Herbert Damker 

Deutsche Telekom AG

TSC Chair, Active Maintainerx

Shilpa Padgaonkar

Deutsche Telekom AG

Active Maintainerx

Jan Friman 

Ericsson

Active Maintainer

Toshi Wakayama

KDDI

Active Maintainerx

Ludovic Robert 

Orange

TSC Deputy Chair, Active Maintainerx

Adnan Saleem 

Radisys

EUC Representative

Doug Makishima 

Summit Tech

EUC Representativex

diego.gonzalezmartinez

Telefonica

Active Maintainerx

Jose Luis Urien Pinedo

Telefónica

Active Maintainerx

Mahesh Chapalamadugu

Verizon

EUC Representativex

Eric Murray 

Vodafone

TSC Deputy ChairX

Kevin Smith 

Vodafone

Active Maintainer

Chris Howell 

Vonage

Active Maintainer
George Glass

TM Forum

TM Forum Representative

Olta Vangjeli 

TM Forum

TM Forum Representativex

Henry Calvert 

GSMA

GSMA Representative

Mark Cornall 

GSMA

GSMA Representativex

LF Staff: Evan Harrison 

Community: Axel Nennker G. Murat Karabulut Jorge Garcia Hospital Pierre Close SHENG-MU LI Simon Davies Thorsten Lohmar 

Agenda

The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

  • Review and approval of previous meeting minutes
  • Action Items Review
  • General Topics
    • Governance & project management issues
    • Release Management
    • API Backlog
    • Commonalities
    • Identity & Consent Management
  • Specific Topics
  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

Review and approval of previous meeting minutes

Action Item Review

Governance & Project Management issues

  • Sandbox/Incubated/Graduated/Archived proposal - new proposal for the lifecycle of API Repositories
    • Reminder: Issue in Governance to comment: https://github.com/camaraproject/Governance/issues/159, detailed proposal within Wiki: https://wiki.camaraproject.org/x/2IBFAg
    • Thanks to Jorge Garcia Hospital for intensive review and valuable comments.
    • Agreed changes to the proposal based on the comments (not yet. applied to the proposal text):
      • Clarification that there are for cases of outcome for scope enhancements / new API proposals in API Backlog (if accepted within the working group):
        • Scope enhancements which are only impacting existing APIs are handled in existing API Repository
        • Scope enhancements proposed by a Sub Project and resulting in a new API: The Sandbox API Repository  will immediately part of a Sub Project.
        • If an independent API proposal aims to be part of an existing Sub Project and gets accepted by the Sub Project, the Sandbox API Repository will be part of the Sub Project from the beginning as well.
        • An independent API proposal which has no target Sub Project gets only a Sandbox API Repository, but yet a Sub Project.
      • Within the Incubation pre-requisites it is sufficient that a previous (initial) version has been implemented – deleting the requirement that it has been (commercially) launched
      • Removing the dependencies between initial/stable API versions and Sandbox/Incubated status (requires the review of criteria for Stable API versions)
      • Incubation process will be decoupled time wise from the Meta-release cycles
      • Requirements to continuously update API to follow Commonalities changes have to be discussed
    • Further outcomes of the discussion:
      • Clarification that the nomination of a Maintainer for an API Repository after the initial development phase isn't time consuming, to encourage the active support from operators for an API they want to get incubated
      • Requirements about updates of APIs to follow Commonalities changes have to be clarified
      • With the current proposed requirements we have currently only Sandbox and Incubated API Repositories. Graduation will happen based on commercial adoption by operators.

Release Management (Tanja de Groot) - updated  

API Backlog (patricia.serranogonzalez@telefonica.com Jorge Garcia Hospital )

  • Repository for QualityByDesign created (as decided last meeting)
  • New API proposal brought to TSC (2):

See message https://lists.camaraproject.org/g/tsc/message/227

Commonalities (Rafal Artych )

  • An issue is open to discuss the scope of the next version: Commonalities/issues/273 - scope should be closed for
    • Since 5 APIs are now stable - how to deal with guidelines enforcing breaking changes in API specifications?
  • M1 date for Spring25

Identity & Consent Management  (Axel Nennker )

Specific Topic: Arazzo Specification discussion (Kevin Smith )

Any Other Business

  • ...

Next Meeting

  • Next TSC Meeting would be on October 3rd at 10:00 CEST / 8:00 UTC / 01:00 PST
  • Specific agenda topics (backlog):
    • ...

Action items

  • ...
  • No labels