DRAFT MINUTES

Attendees & Representation

Type @ and your name to indicate your attendance

LF Staff: 

Community: @Herbert Damker @Ben Hepworth @Jose Luis Urien Pinedo @Randy Levensalor @Eric Murray @Masaharu Hattori

Agenda

• Antitrust Policy

• Review of previous meeting minutes

• Overall Topics

• Regular Topics

  • Closed PRs and Issues

  • Open Pull Requests

  • New Issues

  • Open Issues

• Any Other Topics

Minutes

Review of previous meeting minutes

• Previous meeting minutes: 2024-09-20 Quality on Demand - Meeting Minutes

  • no comments

Overall topics

• Patch release for Fall24?

  • See https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/368

  • Issue describes potential scope. Decision about patch release in next meeting, having the PRs.

• Spring25 Release

  • Scope Issue to be created

Closed Pull Requests & Issues

• #364 Patch wiki links

  • Correction due to wiki migration

Open Pull Requests

• #367 Add QoS Profile User Story

  • will fix #341

  • some changes discussed, will be addressed by Ben, then open for final review.

New Issues

• #366 QoS Profile Get ALL

  • Discussion/Question about POST /retrieve-qos-profile

  • Moved to discussion, issue closed

• #363 Local links within API documentation have to be release specific

  • Created after last QoD call, relevant for potential patch release r1.3

Issues considered in discussion for scope of Spring25 release

• #362 Support of Multi-SIM lines in QoD APIs

  • Previous minutes:

    • Target: define a common behaviour across operators (which all operators can implement)

    • Secondary MSISDNs: not known to users/developers, can't be used in public

    • Just using the "main" device not sufficient (way to notify the application about the chosen device/SIM missing)

    • Enabling all devices with same MSISDN? 

      • Maybe an option, but only in combination with a selected application (IP) flow

    • Request to those who have implemented to share their current solution
      
      

      • Target: Derive some guideline/documentation update for the current version

    • Documentation of expected behaviour also relevant for a Fall24 patch release

  • Discussion to be continued within the issue (@all)

    • Differentiate between short-term clarification in API documentation

    • Long-term solution (within next release?)

• #361 Authorization and Authentication section need to be aligned with ICM 0.2.0 text

  • @Herbert Damker will create the PR

• #359 Add explanation on why there is a "POST /retrieve-sessions" instead of GET

  • See also new issue #366 which indicates that there is a need for clarification how to get all profiles

  • @Randy Levensalor to prepare a PR, across all three APIs

• #341 Add user story for QoS Profiles

  • see PR #367

• #337 Potential enhancement of booking feature for qod-provision

  • new comment with use case draft available: https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/337#issuecomment-2391997666

  • @Masaharu Hattori offered to propose a state diagram, as started to discussed in the issue.

  • @Eric Murray propose to have also a user story which describes the value of the feature

  • An important question if the “booking” comes with reservation of resources (a commitment that the session will be available at the requested time) or only a scheduling of the session/provisioning creation

    • a reservation would require to also provide the geographic region, to allow the network operator to check/reserve resources

• #147 Extend the query capabilities for Qos Profiles

  • Not discussed, no update

  • Previous meeting minutes

    • Application-profile as potential input, returning fitting qos-profiles

      • Challenge: application-profile is a resource which need first to be created

    • Use of application-profile API is also discussed in other Sub Project (e.g. EdgeCloud)

    • Potentially related: Commonalities/issues/179

• #173 Add support for DSCP markings for QoD sessions

  • Not discussed, no update

  • Previous meeting minutes:

    • Refining use case as next step

    • DSCP to matching an IP flow? 

    • Use of L4S in context of a QoS profile as one potential user story

• #302 Providing developers with alternate to QoS profile

  • Not discussed, no update

  • Previous meeting minutes:

    • potential via #147 instead as a direct parameter within the quality-on-demand API

    • evaluate relation to new QualityByDesign concept

• Remaining issues (#45, #194, #243, #286, #304, #317) to be checked (off-line) regarding closing / taking into scope

Any other topics

• Next QoD meeting will be on October 18th, at 14:00 CEST / 12:00 UTC, @Randy Levensalor will take preparation and moderation.

Action items