Enhancement API to align with Chain Agnostic Improvement Proposals (CAIPs) · Issue #72 · camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress

WG

ONGOING

27/FEB/25: Agreed by WG to discuss this point within the next MetaRelease. Will be addressed after Issue 52 conclusion.

24/APR/25: Commented during the meeting we can begin to think about this topic. As commented by Georgios, good thing is that considering new Blockchain Networks do not modify the flow at all.

08/MAY/25: Pedro has not reviewed this topic yet. Georgios comments about an idea to manage that, by means of accomodating the new blockchain networks via the current defined model (as CAIP was analyzed time ago within the WG). Pedro likes this point of view and for implementation topics, in API Documentation it could be documented the relationship between current model and the CAIP model for the blockchains commented within the issue, just for underlying implementations that would rely on this model. To be checked in the next weeks.

22/MAY/25: Pedro will work next week in this approach and will share within the issue.

Enhancement of blockchainPublicAddress (Part 2) - Enforcement of Blockchain ownership to the user whose phoneNumber is going to be used for the binding · Issue #78 · camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress

WG

ONGOING

24/APR/25: FollowUp of Issue 52. To work over it for the pending parts

08/MAY/25: After some investigation, Pedro indicates a possible way of doing this by means of an API. He needs to write down with the details. Basically, to cover this by an API solution it is needed that API provider is in the middle to be aware of the signature and store ir for later checking, that is for off-chain. Georgios is aligned with this. On-chain solution would imply Cross-Operator agreement to use/manage/implement a common wallet. Pedro and Georgios will work offline about that idea. No feedback received from Aleph Zero on this matter yet.

22/MAY/25: Both Georgios and Pedro have been investigating this topic offline. Not a solution found so far. They will be in touch, once a solution is found will be shared within the WG.

Scope for blockchain-public-address version 0.3.0 · Issue #79 · camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress

WG

NEW

08/MAY/25: Scope issue for the API blockchain-public-address generated

Scope for blockchain-public-address-validation version 0.1.0 · Issue #86 · camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress

WG

NEW

08/MAY/25: Scope issue for the API blockchain-public-address-validation generated

AoB

WG