2025-07-03 TSC Minutes

2025-07-03 TSC Minutes

DRAFT MINUTES

Attendees & Representation

TSC Members may indicate their attendance with an X in the far column

TSC Members may indicate their attendance with an X in the far column

Representatives

Organization

Role

 

@Herbert Damker

Deutsche Telekom AG

Maintainer

x

@Shilpa Padgaonkar

Deutsche Telekom AG

Maintainer

x

@Jan Friman

Ericsson

Maintainer

x

@Toshi Wakayama

KDDI

Maintainer

x

@Ludovic Robert

Orange

Maintainer

x

@Tanja de Groot

Nokia

Maintainer, Release Manager

x

@diego.gonzalezmartinez

Telefonica

Maintainer

x

@Jose Luis Urien Pinedo

Telefónica

Maintainer

x

@Eric Murray

Vodafone

Maintainer

x

@Mahesh Chapalamadugu

Verizon

Maintainer

x

@Nick Venezia

Centillion.ai

EUC Representative

 

@massimiliano.troiani

Verizon

EUC Representative

 

@Doug Makishima

Summit Tech

EUC Representative

 

George Glass

alt: @Olta Vangjeli

TM Forum

TM Form Representative

x

@Henry Calvert

alt: @Mark Cornall

GSMA

GSMA Representative 

x

Community members may use @name tag to mark their attendance

Community:

@Jesús Peña García-Oliva

@Artur Krukowski @Pierre Close Aviv Guetta

@Kevin Smith @Rafal Artych

@Surajj Jaggernath

@Alberto Ramos Monaga

 

 

 

 

Action Item Review

LF Staff:

Agenda

The project's Antitrust Policy is linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important when multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review it, and if you have any questions, please contact your company's legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

  • Review and approval of previous meeting minutes

  • Action Items Review

  • General Topics

    • Governance & project management issues

    • API Backlog

    • Commonalities

    • Identity & Consent Management

    • Release Management

  • Specific Topics

    • ...

  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

Review and approval of previous meeting minutes

Action Item Review

Governance & Project Management issues (@Casey Cain @Herbert Damker )

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/ReleaseManagement/issues/238

    • Action: Need - at least for all stable API - to check if a patch release will be good enough (eg for OTP Validation)

    • Direction: API repositories can participate with a patch release within the meta-release

    • Details will be discussed within Release Management, processes are already in place

      • Especially timing regarding M3 vs M4

      • In current release cycle recommendation will be given based on existing release PRs (potentially changing to patch releases)

API Backlog ( @Alberto Ramos Monaga )

  • No new APIs or proposals for this session.

For information:

  • (urgent) API repository split was pushed for existing Location Insights repository due to:

    • Release Candidate for Most Frequent Location was been pushed

    • No new updates or information for Device Visit Location

Decision is to split those two APIs in separate repositories (even if they become part of the same Location Insights subproject eventually) [update 2025-07-09: new Sandbox repository DeviceVisitLocation created, existing repository LocationInsights renamed to MostFrequentLocation]

  • Frozen API proposal was merged (/Governance/pull/190) proposal for freezing API proposals and repositories when there is no activity. WoW will be implemented in backlog from now on.

 

Commonalities (@Rafal Artych )

Identity & Consent Management (@Jesús Peña García-Oliva )

Release Management (@Tanja de Groot)

  • Fall25 M3 cut off date for release PRs was Jun 28, but not all APIs are ready.

  • Currently 62 APIs are proposed for the meta-release:

    • 27 new APIs

    • 35 updated APIs (of which 11 stable APIs (all 9 Spring25 stable APIs updates plus 2 first-time stable APIs)

    • These APIs account for 44 repositories to be reviewed.

  • M3 readiness of (repository) release PRs:

    • 26 repositories have release PRs and release review issues - Release Management reviews have started

    • 7 addition repositories have a release PR in draft mode, as previous PRs still need to be merged

    • 7 repositories do not yet have a release PR but are more or less on the way

    • 4 repositories are proposed to not proceed for Fall25 (on

      • NetworkAccessManagement (many open issues without PRs, recommend to split yaml and to do a first release outside of meta-release; target the Spring26 meta-release)

      • WebRTC (no updates for Fall25, suggest to target the Spring26) - update: work resumed, potentially will participate in Fall25

      • HighThroughputElasticNetworks (no scope issue, no yaml, no PRs)

      • IoTSIMFraudPrevention (no scope issue, no yaml, no PRs)

  • Additional people are now part of the Release Management review team: thanks to Kevin and Jose Luis to have joined their forces

    • 40 repositories to be reviewed over next week is 8 reviews per day = 1 new or 2 (new+update) reviews per person per day.

  • PROPOSAL:

    • exceptionally, allow the 14 pending release PRs to be submitted until next tuesday COB July 8 (final cutt-off date)

    • Reviews already started and would be running in parallel until July 16th (one week is expected to be too short)

    • M3 final declaration by TSC on July 17th.

  • NOTE, for APIs not doing any MAJOR or MINOR updates, but only PATCH updates in particular to align with Fall25 Commonalities and ICM, just a maintenance release may be done to be included in Fall25. See issue Allow maintenance releases to participate in the meta-releases · Issue #238 · camaraproject/ReleaseManagement.

Any Other Business

  • ...

Next Meeting

  • Next TSC Meeting will be on July 17th, 15:00 UTC

  • Specific agenda topics backlog:

    • OWASP security guidelines (@Rafal Artych@Kevin Smith ) - if there are more learning within CAMARA

       

Action items