Results of applying gherkinlint to the test definitions #180

DT, WG

ONGOING

Issue opened on 04/SEP, after initial checking done by @Rafal Artych.
To be covered in the next MetaRelease track

Rafal indicates next steps regarding it is ongoing work in Commonalities and we can take advantage so far to make imporvements in tests definition. @Pedro Díez García to check

16/OCT: Pedro is analyzing tests results, Conclusions will be reported in the issue. Maybe some feedback to be reported to Commonalities. Clear points will be addressed by means of new PR.

https://github.com/camaraproject/CarrierBillingCheckOut/issues/161

STC

ONGOING

Clarifications provided and kingly asked to close it and follow Up on issue #179. Waiting for STC feedback

16/OCT: Checked to be moved to a discussion and set the issue closed after it.

Conditional Mandatory Parameters as per Business Needs · Issue #179 · camaraproject/CarrierBillingCheckOut

STC

ONGOING

Resume Issue on 02/OCT meeting.

Agreed to address this consideration with a generic sentence that would be comfortable for everybody

15/OCT:
PR
Clarifications about optional parameters by PedroDiez · Pull Request #183 · camaraproject/CarrierBillingCheckOut triggered

Check whether there is a deadline for patch release within MetaRelease Fall24.

Carrier Billing Partial Refund: No Amount Field Available for /payments/{paymentId}/refunds · Issue #181 · camaraproject/CarrierBillingCheckOut

STC

CLOSED

Question raised by STC in order to check amount for partial refund. Clarification provided and wating STC feedback in order to close it

It is a matter of swagger editor renderization, but API definition is covering the concern raised within the issue.

16/OCT: Set to closed as no issue

Identify if the payment is one time payment or recurring payment · Issue #114 · camaraproject/CarrierBillingCheckOut

STC

ONGOING

Resume Issue discussion. Talk about prioritization

WG Output:

• Kind request STC for business detailed information about this scenario.

• Check internally, for Operators interested on it to freely comment about prioritization of this feature

16/OCT: Waiting for more information from STC and see next steps

Reversal API · Issue #115 · camaraproject/CarrierBillingCheckOut

STC

ON-HOLD

Resume Issue discussion. Talk about prioritization

WG Output: Kind request to STC to open API Backlog request for this new functionality to check its consideration.

AoB

WG

N/A