DRAFT AGENDA

Date

22 Oct 2024

Attendees & Representation

Community: Ludovic Robert Jose Luis Urien Pinedo Cetin Alpaycetin Huub Appelboom Akos Hunyadi Joachim Dahlgren Surajj Jaggernath Rafal Artych

Agenda

Antitrust Policy

• Approve previous meeting minutes

  • Approved ? No comments - approved

• Open issues and PRs

Minutes

Release patch r1.3

• To be considered. Candidate fixes:

  • Issue:Update errormessage for unsupported device identifieres Small typo in GENERIC_422_UNSUPPORTED_DEVICE_IDENTIFIERS - example, PR: Update errormessage for unsupported device identifieres

    • New PR reviewed, it could be merged into main

  • Fix links for geofencing-subscriptions in README, add links also to Changelog

  • Decision: We can wait to have something more relevant to create a new patch as it is cosmetic.

  • New issue created to have a tracking: Scope for potential patch r1.3

  • Discussion about having a deadline for the project. We can wait more time before to close this release. This topic will be addressed during each calls.

New

• [geofencing-subscriptions]: MultieventSubscriptionNotSupported instead of PermissionDenied.

  • PR: Correct the example for sub - initialEvent and error MULTIEVENT_SUBSCRIPTION_NOT_SUPPORTED and some typos.

  • The name of the example does not correspond with the content

  • Many typos corrected

  • Makes sense to be corrected to main and be potentially added to future patch r1.3

  • Meeting outputs: No comment from the team - Jose Luis Urien Pinedo will approve & merge

Old

• Issue [Retrieval] What is the expected behavior when maxAge value is above threshold supported by the operator?

  • Answered by Cetin Alpaycetin

  • No further interaction, it could be closed - Closed

• Update location-retrieval with add maxSurface management

  • After issue How to understand the response parameter area in the device retrieval API

  • Review and comment

    • Add a note in the yaml for the minimum → Pending Ludovic Robert ?

    • We will wait before to merge to avoid collision with Meta release patch

• Support of Multi-SIM lines in DeviceLocation APIs

  • Derived from camaraproject/Commonalities#302

    • Some new comments but no conclusions

  • Device Location APIs are specially problematic as location is linked to a physical device, not to a phone number 

  • Discussion during last meeting:

    • The issue has a technical aspect  but it is more important for Product Management.

    • For Location-verification probably we can consider that if any device is in 'the zone' then the result will be true. Perhaps same for geofencing.

    • For location-retrieval the issue is more critical as sending back an array of location is probably not a good solution

    • We need to think about UC in particular as location retrieval is probably used for non-personal device (for sensitive reason) so is there really a requirement for multi-sim for this API?

    • Action for each company to work with product team to refine the requirement

• The issue to improve Geofencing with LOOSE, MODERATE, STRICT 'flavor' is still open #133

  • From previous meeting: Should be part of the discussion for next version.

  • Ludovic Robert is working on this topic within Orange.

  • Issue still relevant

Waiting for commonalities

• Add an “Area” data-type into CAMARA_common.yaml

  • No new comments

  • From previous meeting: 

    • related issue in Commonalities

    • New PR in Commonalities: https://github.com/camaraproject/Commonalities/pull/315

      • To be reviewed

• Evolution of subscription guidelines that may affect geofencing-subscriptions:

  • Resource-based subscription – GET /subscriptions using a 3-legged access token

  • Resource-based subscription – guidelines for expiration time set by API operator policy

  • Ludovic Robert is working on a global PR for commonalities.

    • Any update?

      • Action: Ludovic Robert will create an issue to discuss data minimization for the geofencing

      • Request to the team to track progress & comment here (WIP) Subscription & events for Commonalities 0.5.0 by bigludo7 · Pull Request #313 · camaraproject/Commonalities (github.com)

AOB

From latest TSC:

• Proposal to schedule all meeting within CAMARA anchored on UTC

  • See https://github.com/camaraproject/Governance/issues/164

  • Decisions:

    • No opposition to switch to UTC → All meetings will be anchored in UTC

    • Each community decides on which UTC time they want to anchor their meeting

For DeviceLocation current slots are:

• During CEST: 7:00 UTC → If we choose this one all year around, meetings would be at 9:00 during CEST and at 8:00 during CET

• During CET: 8:00 UTC→ If we choose this one all year around, meetings would be at 10:00 during CEST and at 9:00 during CET

Action: Take a decision during meeting or open a discussion in Github

From the team feedback we have preference for the second proposal from José, Joachim, Akos and Ludovic

Action items

Next meeting

Jose Luis Urien Pinedo and Ludovic Robert will be not available for 05 Nov 2024 meeting - Meeting will be skipped.