Page Comparison

Attendees & Representation

...

...

• API proposal "Device Location Retrieval" - see message https://lists.camaraproject.org/g/tsc/message/105
  • Initial version of the YAML already available within the sub project "Device Location"
  • Hence just a formal approval required
  • #Approved
• API proposal "Network Slicing" - see message https://lists.camaraproject.org/g/tsc/message/104
  • Application proposal: APIproposal_NetworkSlicing_ChinaUnicom.md
    • Discussion within related issue: https://github.com/camaraproject/WorkingGroups/issues/317
    • Supporting presentation in PPT
    • Endorsed by API Backlog WG Jan 11th, see meeting minutes
    • Jan raised a question about the name of the API as it more about ordering/reservation than Network Slicing itself.
      • Discussion about use of "on-demand" label - rationale for this? 
        
        • • Kai Zhang: on-Demand because the customer will dynamically reserve the slice
      • The API could have the reservation name (and it will be decided by the project later)  but what's about the project name?  Herbert: what about Network Slicing ... on-Demand ? Booking ? Reservation?
      • Discussion about project granularity: Reservation but then does device attachment should be managed in same project? Herbert explained that we targeted 'small' project in term of APIs managed (to be flexible for CAMARA meta release management) - It is possible to have several APIs but must be very close and released together.
        • Ms. De Groot From a developer perspective, what do they want to call the sub-project? On Demand, or Network Slicing - The API needs to be explicit in the name
        • Mr. Damker gave the final answer to end the discussion for now, the option for the team to come back at a later time to decide upon a name, or they can make the decision during the meeting (TSC 1/18) -
    • Approved

Commonalities

• Initial input info by Shilpa
• Target date for release 0.3.0 is to be ready for approval on 05.02.2024
• Linting ruleset and guidelines PRs are currently under review. We need to close this review soon.
• API Testing guideline doc has 1 open point left. After this discussion is resolved, PR can be merged.
• Security-scheme and scope update in design guidelines document and reference to document in ICM are also currently in review. 
• Other release 0.3.0 specific PRs are minor documentation changes.
  • Mr. Damker asked when the team is planning on a certain release?
    •  ACTION: Former user (Deleted)  will get a more defined date for the next release

...

• Initial input info by Herbert
• There are two important streams regarding release management:
  • Setup of a release process and schedule for a CAMARA wide "meta release"
  • Addressing the issues within Consolidation Issue for open points release management · Issue #9 · camaraproject/ReleaseManagement (github.com) which are giving guidance to sub project regarding release and versioning topics
  • The latter work will change documents which are under responsibility of Commonalities => how to address it best?
• CAMARA wide "meta release"
  • The coordination of a snapshot across all CAMARA sub projects, including the coordination of dependencies (e.g. to Commonalities)
  • Requires at least two Release Managers for CAMARA
    • Tanja Groot that Nokia is willing to nominate Samuel Adeyemo to act as Release Manager
    • Request for further nominations will be addressed to the Governing Board
  • Release managers report to TSC about release progress
  • Next week (Jan 22- Jan 26), the team plans on sketching out a release roadmap plan.
• The training material from LF about Release Management is available here: https://wikilf-camaraproject.camaraprojectatlassian.orgnet/wiki/x/QAEGVA7e
• Mr. Damker shared a question: Should we try to create these guidelines within the subject, or should we create the guidelines within a small task force from the Commonalities sub-project?
  • It makes sense to have this discussion within the Commonalities group. The task force will outline the guidelines.
    • Decision: The team believes that we should have the guideline discussion within the Release Management meetings as opposed to the Commonalities group.
      •  ACTION: Raise this information in the next Commonalities meeting and make the team aware.
    • Volunteers for the Commonalities Task Force: Mark Cornall 

...