2024-01-18 TSC Minutes
Attendees & Representation
TSC Members may indicate their attendance by marking an X in the column to the right.
Community members may use @name tag to mark their attendance below the table.ย
Representative | Organization | Role | ย |
---|---|---|---|
Herbert Damker | Deutsche Telekom AG | TSC Chair, Active Maintainer | x |
Shilpa Padgaonkar | Deutsche Telekom AG | Active Maintainer | X |
Jan Friman | Ericsson | Active Maintainer | X |
Toshi (Toshiyasu) Wakayama | KDDI | Active Maintainer | X |
Ludovic Robert | Orange | TSC Deputy Chair, Active Maintainer | X |
Adnan Saleem | Radisys | EUC Representative | x |
Doug Makishima | Summit Tech | EUC Representative | X |
Diego Gonzรกlez Martรญnez | Telefonica | Active Maintainer | X |
Jose Luis Urien | Telefรณnica | Active Maintainer | X |
Mahesh Chapalamadugu | Verizon | EUC Representative | X |
Eric Murray | Vodafone | TSC Deputy Chair | x |
Kevin Smith | Vodafone | Active Maintainer | x |
Chris Howell | Vonage | Active Maintainer | ย |
George Glass | TM Forum | TM Form Representative | ย |
Henry Calvert | GSMA | GSMA Representativeย | x |
LF Staff: @Casey Cain @Evan Harrisonย
Community: Jin Xu (Huawei), Kai Zhang (Huawei),ย @Ming Hui Foo, Kai Zhang, @Shuting Qing @Pierre Close @Ramesh Shanmugasundaram @Tanja de Groot @Henry Calvert @Mark Cornallย
Agenda
The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF. |
Roll Call
Action Items Review
Agenda Bashing
General Topics
API Backlog
Commonalities
Identity & Consent Management
Release Management
Any Other Topics
Topics for Governing Board of CAMARA Fund?
Minutes
API Backlog
API proposal "Device Location Retrieval" - see message https://lists.camaraproject.org/g/tsc/message/105
Initial version of the YAML already available within the sub project "Device Location"
Hence just a formal approval required
#Approved
API proposal "Network Slicing" - see message https://lists.camaraproject.org/g/tsc/message/104
Application proposal: APIproposal_NetworkSlicing_ChinaUnicom.md
Discussion within related issue: https://github.com/camaraproject/WorkingGroups/issues/317
Supporting presentation in PPT
Endorsed by API Backlog WG Jan 11th, see meeting minutes
Jan raised a question about the name of the API as it more about ordering/reservation than Network Slicing itself.
Discussion about use of "on-demand" label - rationale for this?ย
ย
Kai Zhang: on-Demand because the customer will dynamically reserve the slice
The API could have the reservation name (and it will be decided by the project later)ย but what's about the project name?ย Herbert: what about Network Slicing ... on-Demand ? Booking ? Reservation?
Discussion about project granularity: Reservation but then does device attachment should be managed in same project? Herbert explained that we targeted 'small' project in term of APIs managed (to be flexible for CAMARA meta release management) - It is possible to have several APIs but must be very close and released together.
Ms. De Groot From a developer perspective, what do they want to call the sub-project? On Demand, or Network Slicing - The API needs to be explicit in the name
Mr. Damker gave the final answer to end the discussion for now, the option for the team to come back at a later time to decide upon a name, or they can make the decision during the meeting (TSC 1/18) -
Approved
Commonalities
Initial input info by Shilpa
Target date for release 0.3.0 is to be ready for approval on 05.02.2024
Linting ruleset and guidelines PRs are currently under review. We need to close this review soon.
API Testing guideline doc has 1 open point left. After this discussion is resolved, PR can be merged.
Security-scheme and scope update in design guidelines document and reference to document in ICM are also currently in review.ย
Other release 0.3.0 specific PRs are minor documentation changes.
Mr. Damker asked when the team is planning on a certain release?
ACTION: @Former user (Deleted) ย will get a more defined date for the next release
Identity & Consent Management
Initial input info by Diego
Agreements regarding releases:
V0.1 to be generated. All issues marked as required for the release are solved (Intended date for release will be next Jan 22 - Jan 26.)
V0.2 to be progressed as fast as possible. Scope: clarifications on existing scope requested by existing issues
V0.3 will include enhancements
OIDC profile:
To be created in CAMARA. Not to rely on starting it in OIDF working group to avoid risk of delay.
Duplicity of information GSMA-CAMARA
AuthN/AuthZ flows will be in CAMARA. Existing ones to be evolved as needed.ย
Issue to be opened in GSMA so duplicated info there is replaced with a reference to CAMARA. GSMA to still have needed information regarding interconnection and routing, referencing to CAMARA when needed
Release Management
Initial input info by Herbert
There are two important streams regarding release management:
Setup of a release process and schedule for a CAMARA wide "meta release"
Addressing the issues withinย Consolidation Issue for open points release management ยท Issue #9 ยท camaraproject/ReleaseManagement (github.com) which are giving guidance to sub project regarding release and versioning topics
The latter work will change documents which are under responsibility of Commonalities => how to address it best?
CAMARA wide "meta release"
The coordination of a snapshot across all CAMARA sub projects, including the coordination of dependencies (e.g. to Commonalities)
Requires at least two Release Managers for CAMARA
Tanja Groot that Nokia is willing to nominate Samuel Adeyemo to act as Release Manager
Request for further nominations will be addressed to the Governing Board
Release managers report to TSC about release progress
Next week (Jan 22- Jan 26), the team plans on sketching out a release roadmap plan.
The training material from LF about Release Management is available here: https://lf-camaraproject.atlassian.net/wiki/x/VA7e
Mr. Damker shared a question: Should we try to create these guidelines within the subject, or should we create the guidelines within a small task force from the Commonalities sub-project?
It makes sense to have this discussion within the Commonalities group. The task force will outline the guidelines.
Decision: The team believes that we should have the guideline discussion within the Release Management meetings as opposed to the Commonalities group.
ACTION: Raise this information in the next Commonalities meeting and make the team aware.Volunteers for the Commonalities Task Force: @Mark Cornallย
Any other topic
Topics for Governing Board of CAMARA Fund on Jan 25th?
Casey Cain: LF ready to introduce EasyCLA within CAMARA. Casey will share documentation with the TSC.
Member companies have to prepare their organisation CLA manager.
https://community.lfx.dev/t/lfx-easycla-overview-slide-deck-video-guides/855