Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Pedro Díez García

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Pedro Díez García

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Community Attendees:

Georgios Papadopoulos (DT)

Rafal Artych(DT)

@Klaus Reifenrath (VF)

Community Attendees:

Julian Ueding (Alpha Zero Foundation)
@Antonio Bartulovic (Alpha Zero Foundation)
Pedro Díez García (TEF)

LF Staff:

Date

Status: 

Status
colourYellow
titleAGENDA/DRAFTREVIEW_PENDING

Final Date for Comments:


Agenda

Antitrust Policy

  • WG status (Settle next steps)

Minutes

Management of WG

  • Meetings are now managed by Zoom, WG appreciates the support and management to Casey Cain.

Consolidated Work

  • N/A

Issues Review

Issue

Who

Status

Notes

Management of New Meetings

Pedro Díez García

Status
colourGreen
titleCLOSED

Meetings information are being moved to LF Tools:

  • Meeting minutes to Confluence CAMARA site for this Subproject. DONE

  • Meeting calls to Zoom. Already managed, with LF support. DONE

WG status - Main Next Objectives

ALL

N/A

Resume meetings after summer period (WG on-hold)

Next overall objective for the WG is to generate a new public release for Blockchain Public Address, within the scope of MetaRelease Spring 25. Therefore Commonalities, I&CM and RM guidelines will have to be followed

No new business requirements so far so we can focus on:

  • Align specification to commonalities

  • Resolve pending issues

https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/16

Pedro Díez García

Status
colourBlue
titleON-HOLD

No feeback received yet from Business side.

  • Consent Management topic is set undefinitely on-hold until input from TEF Business

10/OCT: TEF indicates this topic is still on-hold. Will ping Business durign this quarter

https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/51

Pedro Díez García
Georgios Papadopoulos

Status
colourRed
titlePENDING

Not providing “plain” phoneNumber as input criteria for blockchain retrieval

10/OCT: DT indicates we have to think in a confident solution. TEF indicates not think in detail so far but it will do.

https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/52

Georgios Papadopoulos

Status
colourRed
titlePENDING

Enforcement about blockchainPublicAddress really belongs to the phoneNumber indicated (i.e, the user that owns the phoneNumber)


10/OCT: DT indicates we have to design a solution that provides security and reliability. In the past was commented about sending of OTP but not also sure that could be a good way.

AoB

  • Julian Ueding and @Antonio Bartulovic from Alpha Zero Foundation joints the first time the meeting. They are interested on how they can help and collaborate within the working group.

    • Summary WG history is commented for them to hav some background context.

    • They will ping offline Pedro Díez García to have a call and have better understanding of the WG dynamic.

Next Meetings:

Action items

  •  @WG to comment on Issues #51 and #52 ideas and proposals. Pedro Díez García will also try to have some initial proposal/ideas
  •  Pedro Díez García to generate a PR to align API with Commonalities Guidelines. The PR can be enhanced later after discusions and agreements about open issues.