Agenda

Antitrust Policy

• Agreement of last minutes (Link)

• Action Items Review

• Agenda 1

• Agenda 2

Minutes

Topic 1

• Comments

Action items

• CAMARA Agreement Process Discussion (Link)

• Discussion of Issues and Pull Requests

  • Issue #16: [Backlog] Question on QoD booking proposal

    • Can be closed?

  • Issue #14: Discussion on overlapping with IoT Data Transfer Activation API

  • Issue #11: Usage Scenarios for Dedicated Networks

    • Pull Request #12: Description of Usage Scenarios for the Dedicated Networks API

  • Issue #10: API Design Requirements

    • Pull Request #15: API Design considerations

Minutes

Agreement of minutes

• No Comments, agreed.

Relation to QoD booking API (issue #16)

• Masaharu - Issue #16 can be closed since the QoD booking API will become its own sandbox API (discussed in API backlog as the agreed way). Issue closed.

Relation to IoT Data Transfer API (issue #14)

• Thorsten: Open question asked but not clear if it can be answered

• Rajat: Can it be reasoned as a requirement?

• Rajat: Suggested we make a note on the principle of it, and request closing the issue.

• Tanja: Can also create a new issue with reference to this issue / requirement.

• Agreed with Tanja’s proposal. Thorsten to create the issue.

CAMARA Agreement process

• Discussion - agreed to check with Herbert on the rules and potentially request clarification from Governance.

PR #12 and PR#15

• Walk through and agreed 2 week extension to “finalize” (otherwise implicit accept by Code owners)

Release tracker

• Currently marked as Spring. Unrealistic to meet this goal. Agreed however to keep it as is and update when we have a bit more detail.

Action items

•  Thorsten Lohmar : Create new issue - “what info does DN API return for co-relation” and close related issue #16
•  Rajat Kandoi : Experiment with images / make a proposal for a WoW in the DN API Sub project