Attendees & Representation
Name | Company | Attendee | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Eric Murray | Vodafone (chair) | X | ||
Sachin Kumar | Vodafone | X | ||
Kevin Smith | Vodafone | X | ||
Alex Ferreira | Phronesis | X | ||
Matthew Hornsey | Phronesis | |||
Matthew Hand | Phronesis | X | ||
Sébastien Synold | Intersec | Kevin Smith | Vodafone | |
S, Vigneshwaran | Cognizant | Matthew Hornsey | Phronesis | |
Karthik Raj Rethinakumar | Cognizant | |||
Manish Jain, Manish | Cognizant | |||
Huub Appelboom | KPN | |||
Rafal Artych | DT | X | ||
Abhisek Das | Infosys | X | ||
Brian Smith | Shabodi | X | ||
Umair Ali Rashid | Shabodi | X | ||
Foo Ming Hui | Singtel | X |
Agenda
- Review of previous meeting minutes
- Discussion on requirements for IMEI Fraud
- Review of Device Identifier API status
- AOB
Discussion on IMEI Fraud API
- See API Proposal submission here
- Open discussionsDiscussions:
- #37: IMEI Fraud API Input
- No comments to date - please comment if you have a view
- #34: What values should the IMEI Fraud API respond with to indicate reported ownership status?
- Alex: GSMA maintain own device status registry (https://www.gsma.com/services/deviceregistry/). This has more status information than EIR.
- ACTION: Eric to get more details on GSMA service and status values it maintains
- #37: IMEI Fraud API Input
Review of Device Identifier API status
- Current "work in progress" version can be found here
- New PRs:
- None
- Open PRs:
- None
- New Issues:
- Issue #40: Proposed renaming of device identifier API
- Using sub-project three letter code
dvi
as API name not scalable as additional APIs are added to the sub-project - Proposal is to use
device-identifier
as the new name - Please comment if you have a view
- Using sub-project three letter code
- Issue #40: Proposed renaming of device identifier API
- Open issues:
- Issue #57: Security scheme definition, awaiting resolution of Commonalities #21: API Definition Terminology
- Issue is out of date
- ACTION: Eric to update issue text
- Issue #30: Defined scopes and meanings, being discussed in Issue
- Proposal is to have two scopes - one for all information, and one for TAC, Make and Model only
- Brian: Should separate paths be defined rather than have a single path which accepts two scopes?
- Please comment if you have a view
- Issue #57: Security scheme definition, awaiting resolution of Commonalities #21: API Definition Terminology
- Open Discussions:
- Discussion #35: Age of information or device connectivity status
- Vodafone's implementation checks in "real time", so device must be connected and "age of information" would be 0
- The current API design implicitly assumes these values
- Other implementor's solutions may rely on cached data possibly be out of date, and hence require such a field
- Please comment if you have a view
- Vodafone's implementation checks in "real time", so device must be connected and "age of information" would be 0
- Discussion #36: Alternative device identifiers
- No discussion yet - please comment if you have a view
- Discussion #35: Age of information or device connectivity status
AOB
- Next meeting to be held Friday 15th December 2023 @ 09:00 GMT
- One day, meetings will be held using the LFX Zoom service, but not yet