Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: draft removed

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Attendees & Representation

Type @ and your name to indicate your attendance


LF Staff: na

Community: Toshi Wakayama  Ben Hepworth Jose Luis Urien Pinedo Nick VrionisEric MurrayAkos Hunyadi  Herbert Damker Thorsten Lohmar efezhan Gervais-Martial Ngueko Joachim Dahlgren Masaharu Hattori Rafal Artych Ramesh Shanmugasundaram Randy Levensalor Surajj Jaggernath 

Agenda

  • Antitrust Policy
  • Review of previous meeting minutes
  • Overall Topics...
  • Regular Topics
    • Open Pull Requests
    • New Issues
    • Issues relevant for v0.11.0
  • Any Other Topics

...

Overall topics

Open Pull Requests (open for review)

  • PR #299 New API QOD Provision
    • Name of
    • endpoint to be discussed (see comments from Randy Levensalor within the PR). Eric: "provision" is mobile terminology, would be good to avoid.
    • Jorge Garcia Hospital will ask Jose Luis Urien Pinedo to address the comments.
    • To be able to include it within the release candidate we need to conclude the discussions about the PR until the next meeting (starting the final review).
    • API changed to qod-provisioning
    • Request to all to review the latest version within the Pull Request. Please add your comments (or approval) until end of next weeks

Closed issues

New Issues

  • #315
  • #316

Issues relevant for v0.11.0

Issues relevant for v0.11.0 (if not yet covered by PRs)

  • #268 Provision mode for QoD
    • See PR 299Regarding cucumber code, see #322
    • Jose Luis Urien Pinedo will check if internal test definitions can be adapted
    • Most probably we won't have a sufficient test .feature file at M3
    • Target to have it in advance of M4.

Further Issues

  • #302 Providing developers with alternate to QoS profile
    • new enhancement proposal by Mahesh Chapalamadugu 
    • discussion to be continued within the issue
    • Proposal to put into backlog for next release, as the discussion can't be concluded for the current release => put into the issue.
    • For quality-on-demand there is only one reference (to be deleted), see #321
    • Proposal to move the issue to backlog - agreed

Review scope and time plan for Release Candidate

  • PR #320 New API Readiness Checklists for quality-on-demand and qos-profiles
    • Current open "to be dones":
      • API Definition (open Issues/PRs)
      • DesignguidelinesfromCommonalitiesapplied (open Issues/PRs)
      • BasicAPItestcases & documentation (see #245!)
      • Changelog update (will be done in release PR)
    • User stories and Enhanced API test cases are not mandatory for  0.x API versions
  • Target to have the release candidate PR ready within the next QoD call on July 26th.
  • We will go for the Meta-Release with an "Initial" API Version, which means to keep v0.11.0
    • Why we don't go for "Stable":
      • Lack of prerequisites (test cases, certification of previous version)
      • Too many changes between v0.10.0 and v0.11.0, we should have one cycle where we don't introduce breaking changes

Any other topics

  • Next QoD meeting will be on July 26th, at 14:00 CEST / 12:00 UTC
  • We don't plan to skip meeting meetings until the release (at least for now).

...