DRAFT AGENDA
Date
Attendees & Representation
Community:
Agenda
Antitrust Policy
Approve previous meeting minutes
Approved ?
Open issues and PRs
Minutes
Spring25 Meta-release
Created API trackers for the current 3 APIs, but next versions tbd
location-verification will be 1.1 or 2.0 depending on whether back-compatibility is broken
It seems that alignment with Commonalities implies a new major version
geofencing-subscriptions to be 0.4 due to the lack of any implementation certified GSMA
location-retrieval could be upgraded to stable but no one was particularly interested right now. We are also adding the new functionality for maxSurface and it would be good to have some feedback from customers
Are we all OK with targeting version 0.4 for it?
An issue per API created:
We have to create a new PR per API with all changes from Commonalities and ICM
Update info.description with commonalities
Is the update required for Geofencing?
Error Alignement with Commonalities
New error format with enums
New and updated error codes
Waiting decision in Commonalities about which errors to remove (5xx…)
Update geofencing-subcriptions to new guidelines for subscriptions and events
Split the work:
Jose Luis Urien Pinedo has started working on location-verification
Open topics for Spring25
Update location-retrieval with add
maxSurface
managementReady but we will wait before to merge to avoid collision with Meta release patch
Can we merge now?
Support of Multi-SIM lines in DeviceLocation APIs
Review new proposal by Javier Carro
Define guidelines for geofencing implementation
Last comment by Maximilian Laue
Other topics
[Retrieval] Unable to build Location object for /retrieve response
No further interaction
Close?
Discuss data minimization for geofencing event
Following issue camaraproject/Commonalities#295
Review status, in scope for Spring25?
Backlog
API enhancement - Support of landlines
This is not a short/medium term requirement for Telefonica - no prioritized for other company.
We keep for feature for future consideration
discussed:
Should be proposed first to API Backlog Working Group
Any supporters? As of now no.
Release patch r1.3
It has been decided to skip the patch r1.3 due to the lack of relevant fixes.
If something important is reported in the future we will create a dedicated branch for it
Issue created to have a tracking: Scope for potential patch r1.3
AOB
Action items
Next meeting
Proposal
Skip meeting on December 31st
Next week on January 14th, following regular schedule