2024-08-09 Network Access Management - Meeting Minutes
Attendees & Representation
Type @ and your name to indicate your attendance
ย
LF Staff:ย
Community: @Christopher Aubut @Randy Levensalorย @Justin Paceย
Agenda
Review of previous meeting minutes
Overall Topics
Regular Topics
Closed PRs and Issues
Open Pull Requests
New Issues
Open Issues
Any Other Topics
Minutes
Review of previous meeting minutes
Previous meeting minutes: N/A
no comments
Overall topics
Target: Agree / approve the PR for r1.1, plan next steps until final release (PR due on August 26th)
Current status:ย
Closed PRs and Issues
PR #1 Update README.md
PR #3 fix: removes trailing substitution marker from mailing list contact
PR #7 chore: adds initial proposal from the backlog working group
PR #21 Updating mandatory ICM tex
Open Pull Requests
PR #17 Create release v0.1.0
New Issues
Issuesย
N/A
Review scope and time plan for Release Candidate
#18ย Scope of NetworkAccessManagement for Fall24 CAMARA release
#19 Commonalities pass for corrections
The following areas are known to be needing a review:
Add use cases / user stories.
Update return codes.
Add test files.
Review other notes from @Justin Paceย
Any other topics
@Randy Levensalor There is language regarding omitting the device using three-legged auth. ย @Christopher Aubut mentioned this API has a default default mode that does the same.ย Need to review for alignment with commonalities / ICM.
@Christopher Aubut Review Commonalities and DeviceIdentifier to look for overlap with NAM.
Charter and CableLabs are looking at expanding the scope of this API, so any overlap with other CAMARA APIs should be considered.ย
@Randy Levensalor Optional endpoints should be split into different OpenAPI spec files.ย All endpoints in a file should be implemented.
@Christopher Aubut It was mentioned on yesterday's Backlog call that the notion of API Families is going away calling into question if NAM fits as part of Home Devices any more.
From the Backlog call:
API may be split into multiple endpoint files aligning with previous comment from @Randy Levensalor.
Endpoints may share or be split into multiple repos with different CODEOWNERS / MAINTAINERS.
The same meeting should be used for all endpoints, which is not currently done with Home Devices QoD.
Action itemsย
@Christopher Aubut will work on Commonalities pass for release.
Open an issue for splitting the endpoints into different files were appropriate.
Open issue for default device alignment with Commonalities.