https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/16

@Pedro Díez García

ON-HOLD

No feeback received yet from Business side.

• Consent Management topic is set undefinitely on-hold until input from TEF Business

10/OCT: TEF indicates this topic is still on-hold. Will ping Business durign this quarter

24/OCT: So far Keep this ON-HOLD.

https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/51

@Pedro Díez García
@Georgios Papadopoulos

ONGOING

Not providing “plain” phoneNumber as input criteria for blockchain retrieval

10/OCT: DT indicates we have to think in a confident solution. TEF indicates not think in detail so far but it will do.

24/OCT: Proposal presented by TEF to be reviewed. Explained during the meeting. Will be checked offline and if alll fine, it would be a way forwrd to fix the issue.

https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/52

@Georgios Papadopoulos

PENDING

Enforcement about blockchainPublicAddress really belongs to the phoneNumber indicated (i.e, the user that owns the phoneNumber)

10/OCT: DT indicates we have to design a solution that provides security and reliability. In the past was commented about sending of OTP but not also sure that could be a good way.

24/OCT: TEF commented this need deep thinking, as the constrain is how to guarentee the blockcahin is associated to the user whose phoneNumber is used to the bound. DT acknowledges this and indicates the topic would be to ensure how the user has control over the blockchain in a usable manner (An option would be to create a new wallet for each binding but that was not very usable from User’s point of view). DT and TEF will talk offline about this topic.

https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/issues/57

@Pedro Díez García

ONGOING

Issue raised from former meeting in order to adapt API Specification to Commonalities

Related PR raised:
https://github.com/camaraproject/BlockchainPublicAddress/pull/58

Approved by DT (@Georgios Papadopoulos (Unlicensed)). Will be given one more week to provide comments if any and, if no other topics, will be merged on 31/10.

Intention is to have baseline API Spec to work on for the next release.

AoB

WG

PROPOSAL

@Julian Ueding exposes that Aleph Zero would like to be part of Blockchain Networks in the CAMARA Blockchain Ecosystem in order to perform testing integrations. WG finds the proposal fine welcome another blockchain initiative to be as part as CAMARA BlockChain Ecosystem. Indication is given to Aleph Zero to Open an Enhnacement Issue in order to talk about technical API design (in principle it would be a layer 2 blockchain, adhered to EVM ChainId)