Agenda

The project's Antitrust Policy is linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important when multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review it, and if you have any questions, please contact your company’s legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

• Review of previous meeting minutes

• Overall Topics

• Regular Topics

  • Closed PRs and Issues

  • New Issues

  • Open Pull Requests

  • Open Issues in scope of Spring25

• Review of issues and planning for Fall25

  • QualityOnDemand

  • QoSBooking

• Any Other Topics

Minutes

Review of previous meeting minutes

• 2025-02-07 Quality On Demand Minutes no comment, draft note removed

Overall Topics

• QoD promoted to stage “Incubating”

• Public release of QualityOnDemand to be created until February 28th (latest date for complete release PR)

  • ICM r2.3 released, no changes to APIs

  • Commonalities 2.3 released

    • Changes from 2.2 to 2.3 see Analysis of Commonalities 0.5.0

    • Relevant for QoD: https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/413 with https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/420

Regular Topics

• Closed PRs and Issues

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/421 (for information only)

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/407

    • closed https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/408 and https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/397

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/417

    • Closed, was lack of awareness of the difference of implicit and explicit subscriptions

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/403

• Open Pull Requests

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/420

    • Merged

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/423

    • Two comments from @Randy Levensalor and @Eric Murray will be added in the PR

    • Will not fix the issue completely, will continue in Fall25 scope

• New Issues

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/422

    • @Herbert Damker

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/419

    • Not in scope of Spring25, but for Fall25

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/418

    • Relevant for the upcoming stable APIs quality-on-demand and qos-profiles

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/415

    • See PR #423 from @Jose Luis Urien Pinedo

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/414

    • @Randy Levensalor for qos-profiles … will come today (US time!)

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/413

    • Addressed by @Eric Murray in PR #420

• Further open Issues in scope of Spring25

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/371

    • All issues until M3 are done, above issues to be added @Herbert Damker (done)

Review of issues and planning for Fall25

• QualityOnDemand

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/386

    • no update in last meeting, request to issue author to propose changes pending

    • will be closed if there is no further feedback for two meetings

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/304

    • @Herbert Damker Proposal to close the issue, both APIs are now published as stable, and the issue had never strong support

    • @Randy Levensalor will close it

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/302

    • Two options:

      • Leave the topic to ConnectivityInsights (who have ApplicationProfiles as input) to return QoSProfiles

      • Filter functionality on QoS Profiles with ApplicationsProfiles (see #147)

    • Transfer the issue itself to discussions

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/286

    • No update, might depend still on Commonalities

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/243

    • No business requirements to change the definition in this aspect known at the moment

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/194

    • Potentially in scope of Fall25, if there is progress on Commonalities and a CAMARA wide definition which we can include as well

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/147

    • Will be revisited in scope of Fall25

    • @Eric Murray filtering options on latency and/or throughput could be helpful

    • Now easier to add, as we have the request body to add further filter parameters

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/45

    • Current behavior is to fall back to the “base” profile the device was in before the session was requested

    • No business requirements to change the definition in this aspect known at the moment

  • Any further requirements to enhance the APIs?

• QoSBooking

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/401

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QoSBooking/issues/1

    • @Masaharu Hattori a short PR (change “customer” to “API consumer” as well)

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/QoSBooking/issues/4

    • https://github.com/camaraproject/QoSBooking/pull/5

    • @Masaharu Hattori is asking for reviews and feedback to the proposed definition

Any Other Topics

• Renewed invitation to Emil Zhang

• New wiki structure, first example https://lf-camaraproject.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CAM/pages/77922436

• Next call will be on March 7th, 13:00 UTC

Action items