2025-02-21 Quality On Demand Minutes
DRAFT AGENDA
Community Attendees:
@Herbert Damker @Eric Murray @Joachim Dahlgren @Surajj Jaggernath
Community Attendees:
@Jose Luis Urien Pinedo @Masaharu Hattori @Patrice Conil @Rafal Artych @Randy Levensalor V. Anagnostopoulos (INF), Emil Zhang (Ericsson)
LF Staff:
Agenda
The project's Antitrust Policy is linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important when multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review it, and if you have any questions, please contact your company’s legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
Review of previous meeting minutes
Overall Topics
Regular Topics
Closed PRs and Issues
New Issues
Open Pull Requests
Open Issues in scope of Spring25
Review of issues and planning for Fall25
QualityOnDemand
QoSBooking
Any Other Topics
Minutes
Review of previous meeting minutes
2025-02-07 Quality On Demand Minutes no comment
Overall Topics
QoD now “Incubating”
Public release of QualityOnDemand to be created until February 28th (latest date for complete release PR)
ICM r2.3 released, no changes to APIs
Commonalities 2.3 …
Changes from 2.2 to 2.3 see …
Relevant: https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/413 with https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/420
…
Regular Topics
Closed PRs and Issues
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/421 (for information only)
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/417
Closed, was lack of awareness of the difference of implicit and explicit subscriptions
Open Pull Requests
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/420
Merged
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/pull/423
Two comments from @Randy Levensalor and @Eric Murray will be added in the PR
Will not fix the issue completely, will continue in Fall25 scope
New Issues
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/422
@Herbert Damker
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/419
Not in scope of Spring25, but for Fall25
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/418
Relevant for the upcoming stable APIs quality-on-demand and qos-profiles
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/415
See PR #423 from @Jose Luis Urien Pinedo
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/414
@Randy Levensalor for qos-profiles … will come today (US time!)
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/413
Addressed by @Eric Murray in PR #420
Further open Issues in scope of Spring25
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/371
All issues until M3 are done, above issues to be added @Herbert Damker
Review of issues and planning for Fall25
QualityOnDemand
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/386
no update in last meeting, request to issue author to propose changes pending
will be closed if there is no further feedback for two meetings
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/304
@Herbert Damker Proposal to close the issue, both APIs are now published as stable, and the issue had never strong support
@Randy Levensalor will close it
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/302
Two options:
Leave the topic to ConnectivityInsights (who have ApplicationProfiles as input) to return QoSProfiles
Filter functionality on QoS Profiles with ApplicationsProfiles (see #147)
Transfer the issue itself to discussions
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/286
No update, might depend still on Commalities
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/243
No business requirements to change the definition in this aspect known at the moment
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/194
Potentially in scope of Fall25, if there is progress on Commonalities and a CAMARA wide definition which we can include as well
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/147
Will be revisited in scope of Fall25
@Eric Murray filtering options on latency and/or throughput could be helpful
Now easier to add, as we have the request body to add further filter parameters
https://github.com/camaraproject/QualityOnDemand/issues/45
Current behavior is to fall back to the “base” profile the device was in before the session was requested
No business requirements to change the definition in this aspect known at the moment
Any further requirements to enhance the APIs?
QoSBooking
https://github.com/camaraproject/QoSBooking/issues/1
@Masaharu Hattori a short PR (change “customer” to “API consumer” as well)
https://github.com/camaraproject/QoSBooking/issues/4
@Masaharu Hattori is asking for reviews and feedback to the proposed definition
Any Other Topics
Renewed invitation to Emil Zhang
New wiki structure, first example https://lf-camaraproject.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CAM/pages/77922436
Next call will be on March 7th, 13:00 UTC