2023-12-13 - sp-connectivity Minutes
Attendees & Representation
Type @ and your name to indicate your attendance
LF Staff:
Community:
Name | Organisation | Attendance |
---|---|---|
@Mahesh Chapalamadugu | ย Verizon Wireless, 5GFF (Chair) | x |
@Syed Rehman | ย Verizon Wireless | x |
@Kevin Smithย | Vodafone (Minutes) | x |
Santhi Dharmapalan | ย Verizon Wireless | x |
Agenda
The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF. |
Action Items Review
General Topics
ย Pull requests
Any Other Topics
Minutes
Action items review
Mahesh Chapalamadugu ย to mail the mailing list with call details and update time on GitHub 13 Dec 2023ย DONE
Mahesh Chapalamadugu ย to align the Connectivity Insights API spec with commonalities guidelines. 17 Jan 2024ย
Kevin Smith ย to clarify if a need for consent (or a check for consent-needed) is determined by the sub-project or other body in CAMARA. 10 Jan 2024ย
Kevin Smith to add Connectivity Insights to LF CAMARA Wiki as a sub-project 13 Dec 2023ย DONE
General topics
Pull requests
Open:
Merged since last call:
#3 initial upload of Connectivity Insights YAML
#4 call schedule
#5 update maintainers
Issues
Discussions
Discussion on whether we need for port identification at both Device and Application port side
Agreed we would need this for Connectivity Insights between a given device and application server.
The device IPv4 address and public port can be sent by the API consumer, but we will not need to user the private port (pre-NAT) in the API. The schema definitions will be reused from QoD.
AOB
none