2024-02-22 API backlog minutes

Attendees

 

CableLabs

Randy Levensalor

Charter Communications

Chris Aubut,

 Justin Pace

Jason Page

Ericsson

Jan Friman

GSMA

Mark Cornall

Nokia

Tanja De Groot

Shabodi

Nitin Sood

Deustche Telekom

Wirzius, Noel

Telefónica

Ricardo Serrano Gutierrez

Laura Lacarra Arcos

Javier Villa Labarra 

Lukas Wiegandt

Jorge Garcia Hospital

Totogi

Ailton Santana

Vodafone

Eric Murray

Slagen

Dagoberto Garavito

T-Mobile US

Lyle Bertz

Karabulut, Murat

 

Agenda Proposal

  • Antitrust Policy

  • Approval of minutes of last conf. call

  • Recent Updates & Recap

  • Review of Action Points

  • Discussion

    • OGW Drop 3 APIs: 336, 375, 376

    • Other APIs: 351, 372, 378, 383

    • Governance: 367

  • Action Points

  • AOB

  • Q&A

Antitrust Policy

The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LinusFoundation.

 

 

New Procedures in API Backlog WG meetings

A number of improvements are under discussion with leadership team of OGW project (Henry), CAMARA Project (Markus), Product Definition WS (Helene) and TSC (Herbert). As of today, the WG adopted agreements are three:

  1. To close the agenda SEVEN DAYS BEFORE the conf. call.

    • In case a WG participant wants to include a point in the agenda (e.g., present a new API proposal), this participant shall ensure the corresponding issue is opened in Github by then.

    • Exceptional situations will be treated separately.

  2. New schedule of conf. calls

    • 2nd Thursday of the month (10-11 CET)

    • 4th Thursday of the month (15-16 CET)

  3.  Send agenda to TSC mail list, to encourage more TSC member companies to join the call and provide comments when they identify APIs which are of interest for them. 

Meeting Minutes within Wiki instead of Github

  • CAMARA community agreed that meeting minutes would only be recorded in the wiki

Approval of minutes of last conf. call

  • Minutes of last API backlog WG call available here

    • DECISION: The minutes are approved. 

Recent Updates & Recap

 

Backlog table

Review of Action Points

AP #

AP Owner

AP description

Related issue

Due date

Status

20230208-04

Charter Communications

Check potential relationship of this API proposal with existing HomeDevicesQoD, draw conclusions and propose a way forward. 

2024/02/21

Open

20230208-03

Charter Communications

Re-assess how much essential is to include site info in the API, and if this info can be removed. 

2024/02/21

Closed

20230208-02

WG delegates

Delegates from interested parties to prepare a list of questions for this API, for Nick to answer them.

2024/02/21

Open

20230208-01

Centilion

To draft a simple figure illustrating the API logic with a high-level workflow, and attach it to the PR.  

2024/02/21

Open

20230125-05

Deutsche Telekom

to improve and clarify the API proposal, based on discussion during the call.

2024/02/01

Closed

20230125-04

Deutsche Telekom

to improve and clarify the API proposal, based on discussion during the call.

2024/02/01

Closed

Discussion

Current Issues 

330

China Unicom

New API proposal: Device Visit Location
The API template is available in PR#329

The issue was not treated in this conference call

The issue is not eligible to be closed yet.

 

336

Telefónica

New API proposal: OGW Home Location Verification
The API template is available in PR#337.
Input from OGW Drop 3

The issue was not treated in this conference call

The issue is not eligible to be closed yet.

351

Centillion

New Proposal for Authorization for Advertisements, Advertisements Consent, and Measurement
The API template is available in PR#386.

The issue was not treated in this conference call 

  • AP 20230208-01 still open.

The issue is not eligible to be closed yet.

367

Governance

Adapt Project StructuresAndRoles.MD to changes in API backlog table (reduction of comments)
The aim is to update the governing document to reflect on the updated changes on API submission pipeline, according to the new structure of the API backlog table.

Progress ongoing, and offline discussion on RACI matrix to WoW among OGW Product, CAMARA APIBacklog and CAMARA TSC. PR pending submission.

The issue is not eligible to be closed yet.

372

Totogi

New Proposal: Receive SMS
No PR available.

Proposal to recover incomes from services CPaaS increase interactivity 

ACTION: Ailton (Topogi) to fill the template and Backlog governance to review colissions on this.

The issue is not eligible to be closed yet.

375

Deutsche Telekom

Device Quality Indicator
The API template is available in PR#380
Input from OGW Drop 3

Jan Friman: Suggest to review the name and better use Device Connection Indication. Noel agreed

  • AP 20230125-05 still open.

DECISION: Move to TSC after name harmonization (This was done before the Call ended)

376

Deutsche Telekom

Best Interconnection
The API template is available in PR#381
Input from OGW Drop 3

No colission with Edge Selecion API it is a more wide API scope oriented to for example authonomous systems. Focused in fixed lines

Jorge: Two codeowners are needed in case a new SG is created (seek for support in that case by DT)

DECISION: Move to TSC

378

Charter Communications

CPE management
The API template is available in PR#379.       First YAML available here.

  • AP 20230208-04 still open

ACTION: Define very crearly the scope of this API and provide focused use cases let that written in the PR#379.    

The issue is not eligible to be closed yet.

383

T-Mobile US

New Proposal: Capability and Runtime Restrictions
The API template is available in PR#384

 

Murat (TMUS): showed the proposal:

The issue is not eligible to be closed yet.

Closed Issues

 

 

 

 

New Issues

 

 

 

 

 

Action Points

AP #

AP Owner

AP description

Related issue

Due date

Status

20230208-04

Charter Communications

Check potential relationship of this API proposal with existing HomeDevicesQoD, draw conclusions and propose a way forward. 

2024/02/21

Open

20230208-02

WG delegates

Delegates from interested parties to prepare a list of questions for this API, for Nick to answer them.

2024/02/21

Open

20230208-01

Centilion

To draft a simple figure illustrating the API logic with a high-level workflow, and attach it to the PR.  

2024/02/21

Open

20240222-02

Charter Communications

Define very crearly the scope of this API and provide focused use cases let that written in the PR#379.   

2023/02/13

Open

20240222-01

Topogi

To fill the API template and create the Proposal PR. Backlog Governance to review colissions on this API.

2024/03/13

Open

Decision Points

DP #

DP description

Related issue

20230125-01

the discussion will be resumed in a call that Nick (Centillion) is able to join. 

351

20240222-02

Device Quality Indicator to move foward to TSC for aproval

375

20240222-01

Best Interconnection to move foward to TSC for aproval

376

 

AoB

Next conf. call: 14th March, 10-11 CET.

Q&A

How does CAMARA API pipeline work?

The pipeline consists of FOUR stages:
A. Submission of the API proposal.
B. Evaluation of the API proposal.
C. API proposal voting & decision.
D. Sub-Project setup.

The following clauses provides details on individual stages.

Stage A: Submission of the API proposal

Participants: API owner.
Description: The proccess is detailed here. To proceed with the submission, the API owner shall follow these steps:

  1. Fill in the template available here and save it with the following name: "APIproposal_<APIname>_<owner>. md" locally.

  2. Create a new issue in the API Backlog Working Group repository, labeled with "API Backlog".

  3. Upload the filled-in template to GitHub repository folder for API proposals via Pull Request. This Pull Request shall be associated to the issue created in the previous step.

 

Stage B: Evaluation of the API proposal

Participants: API owner, API backlog WG.
Description: The proccess is detailed here. Upon submission, the API owner will present the proposal in the next API backlog WG meeting, to socialize it with the rest of partners. In paralell..

  1. The WG chair checks that the template is duly filled in. Otherwise, the API owner is requested to provide missing information.

  2. After this sanity check, each WG participant declares their support. If a company wants to become supporter of an API, then a delegate of this company needs to add the company's name in the 'supporters' column in the API backlog table. The more support an API proposal gets, the better (it may get more traction).

  3. When the API owner considers the API proposal is in good shape to go for approval, it informs the WG chair accordingly.

  4. Upon receiving this information, the WG chair merges the Pull Request into the main branch, and sends the API proposal to the Technical Steering Committee (TSC) of CAMARA. This action shall be completed at least one week prior to the TSC meeting where the API proposal will be voted upon.

The whole procedure (steps 1-4) should be done within 2 regular meetings of the API Backlog WG. Nonetheless, it is up to the API owner to decide if it wants to shorten or extend this time period.

 

Stage C: API proposal & voting decision

Participants: TSC.
Description: The proccess is detailed here. Upon receiving the API proposal and notification from the API backlog WG chair, the TSC studies the proosal and votes it at the next TSC meeting.

NOTE 1: Possible decisions outcomes:

  • Not Accepted: The API proposal is rejected, and thus will not be included in any API Sub-Project. The TSC will need to inform the API backlog WG of this decision, and clarify next steps: either (1) remove this API proposal from backlog, with objecting companies providing justifications why; or (2) ask for changes (e.g., clarifications, corrections, gaps to be addressed) required in order for the API to be re-submitted by the API supporters.

  • Accepted: In this case, the TSC shall specify whether the API proposal is to be hosted by a new or existing Sub Project.

NOTE 2: The TSC may also propose changes to an API proposal and take the decision considering these changes. The TSC documents the decision in the CAMARA API overview list (fills in columns TSC date and TSC decision / Sub Project; in case of a No-Go "Rejected" is documented there).

 

Stage D: Sub-Project setup

Participants: API backlog WG, TSC, CAMARA admin team
Description: If an API proposal is accepted and there is a neeed to open a new Sub-Project, the following steps are needed:

  1. Supporting companies propose their initial maintainers to be added for the Sub-Project. The API backlog WG chair centralizes this information, and sends it to the TSC.

  2. The TSC will use this input to oficially nominate the initial maintainers by next TSC meeting.

  3. The CAMARA admin team creates the Sub-Project repository.

NOTE: After the initial maintainers are nominated, the criteria for further maintainers would be three months of active contribution to the sub project. Code owners are to be decided by the maintainers within the subproject.