2025-03-06 TSC Minutes
Attendees & Representation
TSC Members may indicate their attendance with an X in the far column | |||
---|---|---|---|
Representatives | Organization | Role | ย |
@Herbert Damker | Deutsche Telekom AG | Maintainer | x |
@Shilpa Padgaonkar | Deutsche Telekom AG | Maintainer | x |
@Jan Friman | Ericsson | Maintainer | x |
@Toshi Wakayama | KDDI | Maintainer | ย |
@Ludovic Robert | Orange | Maintainer | ย |
@Tanja de Groot | Nokia | Maintainer, Release Manager | x |
@diego.gonzalezmartinez | Telefonica | Maintainer | x |
@Jose Luis Urien Pinedo | Telefรณnica | Maintainer | x |
@Eric Murray | Vodafone | Maintainer | ย |
@Mahesh Chapalamadugu | Verizon | Maintainer | ย |
@Nick Venezia | EUC Representative | ย | |
Massimiliano Troiani | Verizon | EUC Representative | ย |
@Doug Makishima | Summit Tech | EUC Representative | ย |
George Glass | TM Forum | TM Form Representative | ย |
@Henry Calvert | GSMA | GSMA Representativeย | ย |
Community members may use @name tag to mark their attendance
Community: @Kevin Smith @Rafal Artych @Axel Nennker @Jorge Garcia Hospital @Artur Krukowski @ALI IQBAL
LF Staff:
Agenda
The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF. |
Review and approval of previous meeting minutes
General Topics
Governance & project management issues
Release Management
API Backlog
Commonalities
Identity & Consent Management
Any Other Topics
Minutes
Review and approval of previous meeting minutes
Minutes of previous TSC meeting: 2025-02-20 TSC Minutes
no comments
Action Item Review
See home page Technical Steering Committee for current list of open action items
none
Governance & Project Management issues (@Casey Cain @Herbert Damker )
Update of Wiki structure (@Casey Cain)
work in progress, not yet completely done
Incubating API repositories: update of README.md as part of M4 release PRs
https://github.com/camaraproject/Governance/issues/181
Info: Raised within the CAMARA Board meeting and asked for support
https://github.com/camaraproject/Governance/issues/184
Mail not yet send (to avoid MWC time),
Action for @Herbert Damker to send mail to all mailing list with general information, and specific mail to the 32 maintainers/codeowners with disabled 2FA.
Release Management (@Tanja de Groot )
Spring25 M4
All 19 API repositories have submitted their public release PR for M4 review.
11 reviews have been done by release management so far - most of these look OK to be released
Target for finalizing the reviews is March 14.
Latest API public release publishing targeted for March 19.
REMINDER: all APIs that want to release as stable must provide at least one test statement in the issue created for this purpose. It can mention implementation done, but the actual tests may happen after M4. TSC will decide on whether the provided information is sufficient to go for a stable API publication.
Target declaration of M5 by TSC on March 20
Kickoff (M0) to be prepared (March 31).
Commonalities and ICM have started work on scope definitions.
DedicatedNetworks and SimpleEdgeDiscovery are first candidates.
API Backlog (@Jorge Garcia Hospital)
4 new API proposal(s) from APIBacklog working group.
Note: as โspecialโ TSC meeting due to MWC week, APIs will only get approval this time if enough TSC quorum is reached.
IoT Network Optimization, supported by TIM.
Proposal to enable specific IoT services (e.g. energy saving) for certain set of IoT devices connected to a edge application instance.
Original Issue 143; IoT Network Optimization template
Comments:
none
TSC conclusion: approval of TSC will be requested in vote
Network Health Assessment, supported by China Unicom.
Proposal to provide health score for networks (not individual terminal connections).
Original Issue 127; Network Health Assessment template
Comments:
@Jorge Garcia Hospital API should be not be restricted to private networks
@Kevin Smith how does it apply to public networks
@Tanja de Groot should apply also to โdedicated networksโ, so โprivateโ networks in a sense
Conclusion: not intended to be applied to the public network
Q @Jan Friman difference to ConnectivityInsights
A @Jorge Garcia Hospital Connectivity and Session Insight are focused on analysing an specific device connection, while these two proposals are meant for a whole network
TSC conclusion: description to be reworked, conclusion next time
Network Traffic Analysis, supported by China Unicom.
Proposal to provide statistical information of the network traffic (not individual terminal connections).
Original Issue 128; Network Traffic Analysis template
Comments:
@Jorge Garcia Hospital API should not be restricted to private networks
see discussion above
TSC conclusion:description to be reworked, conclusion next time
Dynamic Predictive Connectivity Data, supported by Telefonica and DT.
Proposal to provide network coverage information in certain area/volume for a future period of time, allowing to predict whether network coverage will be available e.g. for a drone on certain sky sector.
Original Issue 163; Dynamic Predictive Connectivity Data template
Comments:
none
TSC conclusion: approval of TSC will be requested in vote
Update on consent URL API proposal:
I&CM (minutes) agreed in a way forward for this API proposal, actions pending on repository creation (under ICM working group).
Commonalities (@Rafal Artych )
Public release of version 0.5.0 published on Feb 21, 2025 available at: https://github.com/camaraproject/Commonalities/tree/r2.3
https://github.com/camaraproject/Commonalities/issues/423
Review of pending issues and propositions of new topics expected before M0.
Objective is to align with the proposed timeline for Fall25, to give sub-projects time for alpha-release preparation and proper testing.
M0 | 03-31 | kick-off preparation |
M1 (Commonalities & ICM) | 04-15 | ย Alpha release |
Discussion:
@Herbert Damker Is there a discussion to reach a stable version within the next meta-release.
@Rafal Artych path to stable should be described, maybe another initial release with few changes, heading towards stable
Identity & Consent Management (@Axel Nennker )
https://github.com/camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement/issues/275
@Axel Nennker reaching stable still difficult, as the current ICM definitions are a sub-set of OIDC and OAuth 2.0, some defined restrictions are under discussion
https://github.com/camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement/pull/266
โNext steps include bring ICM conclusion to TSC to ask for API approval and for repository creation (or subproject management) with ICM as parent group and clarifying release management implications in future updates.โ@Herbert Damker proposes to create an API Repository โConsentInfoโ under supervision of the ICM working group:
To define API(s) which will allow API consumers to (*):
determine the need for Consent: Evaluates whether user Consent is necessary according to the specified parameters and relevant legal requirements.
get the current Consent status: If Consent is required, the API returns the current status (e.g., active, revoked, expired...) so the API Consumer can understand the current User's consent status.
get a Consent Capture URL: If the user has not provided the necessary Consent, the API supplies an API Provider's Consent capture URL where the user can easily complete the Consent process.
The repository follows the rules of API Repositories as defined in https://github.com/camaraproject/Governance/blob/main/ProjectStructureAndRoles.md
Maintainers of the API repository will be the maintainers defined in https://github.com/camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.MD
Initial code owners will be the code owners of IdentityAndConsentManagement (can be changed by the Working Group)
The scope of the API repository will be detailed by writing appropriate user stories
The name of the repository can be changed at a later point of time if the APIs are more detailed
This proposal replaces https://github.com/camaraproject/APIBacklog/pull/67 (New API Proposal - Consent URL API)
Conclusion: The decision of the TSC on the proposal will be taken in a vote
https://github.com/camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement/pull/268
Important issue to get understanding of the consequences of the current definition of CIBA in CAMARA
Any Other Business
@Kevin Smith Please provide feedback to the tooling activity in https://github.com/camaraproject/tooling/discussions/4
Next Meeting
Next TSC Meeting will be on Thursday, March 20th, 15:00 CET
Main point will be the approval of the Spring25 M5
Specific agenda topics backlog:
...
...ย