/
2025-03-06 TSC Minutes

2025-03-06 TSC Minutes

Attendees & Representation

TSC Members may indicate their attendance with an X in the far column

TSC Members may indicate their attendance with an X in the far column

Representatives

Organization

Role

ย 

@Herbert Damker

Deutsche Telekom AG

Maintainer

x

@Shilpa Padgaonkar

Deutsche Telekom AG

Maintainer

x

@Jan Friman

Ericsson

Maintainer

x

@Toshi Wakayama

KDDI

Maintainer

ย 

@Ludovic Robert

Orange

Maintainer

ย 

@Tanja de Groot

Nokia

Maintainer, Release Manager

x

@diego.gonzalezmartinez

Telefonica

Maintainer

x

@Jose Luis Urien Pinedo

Telefรณnica

Maintainer

x

@Eric Murray

Vodafone

Maintainer

ย 

@Mahesh Chapalamadugu

Verizon

Maintainer

ย 

@Nick Venezia

Centillion.ai

EUC Representative

ย 

Massimiliano Troiani

Verizon

EUC Representative

ย 

@Doug Makishima

Summit Tech

EUC Representative

ย 

George Glass

TM Forum

TM Form Representative

ย 

@Henry Calvert

GSMA

GSMA Representativeย 

ย 

Community members may use @name tag to mark their attendance

Community: @Kevin Smith @Rafal Artych @Axel Nennker @Jorge Garcia Hospital @Artur Krukowski @ALI IQBAL

LF Staff:

Agenda

The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

  • Review and approval of previous meeting minutes

  • Action Items Review

  • General Topics

    • Governance & project management issues

    • Release Management

    • API Backlog

    • Commonalities

    • Identity & Consent Management

  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

Review and approval of previous meeting minutes

Action Item Review

Governance & Project Management issues (@Casey Cain @Herbert Damker )

Release Management (@Tanja de Groot )

  • Spring25 M4

    • All 19 API repositories have submitted their public release PR for M4 review.

    • 11 reviews have been done by release management so far - most of these look OK to be released

    • Target for finalizing the reviews is March 14.

    • Latest API public release publishing targeted for March 19.

    • REMINDER: all APIs that want to release as stable must provide at least one test statement in the issue created for this purpose. It can mention implementation done, but the actual tests may happen after M4. TSC will decide on whether the provided information is sufficient to go for a stable API publication.

  • Meta-release Spring25 M5:

    • Target declaration of M5 by TSC on March 20

  • Meta-release Fall25

    • Kickoff (M0) to be prepared (March 31).

    • Commonalities and ICM have started work on scope definitions.

    • DedicatedNetworks and SimpleEdgeDiscovery are first candidates.

API Backlog (@Jorge Garcia Hospital)

4 new API proposal(s) from APIBacklog working group.

Note: as โ€œspecialโ€ TSC meeting due to MWC week, APIs will only get approval this time if enough TSC quorum is reached.

  • IoT Network Optimization, supported by TIM.

    • Proposal to enable specific IoT services (e.g. energy saving) for certain set of IoT devices connected to a edge application instance.

    • Original Issue 143; IoT Network Optimization template

    • Comments:

      • none

    • TSC conclusion: approval of TSC will be requested in vote

  • Network Health Assessment, supported by China Unicom.

    • Proposal to provide health score for networks (not individual terminal connections).

    • Original Issue 127; Network Health Assessment template

    • Comments:

      • @Jorge Garcia Hospital API should be not be restricted to private networks

      • @Kevin Smith how does it apply to public networks

      • @Tanja de Groot should apply also to โ€œdedicated networksโ€, so โ€œprivateโ€ networks in a sense

      • Conclusion: not intended to be applied to the public network

      • Q @Jan Friman difference to ConnectivityInsights

        • A @Jorge Garcia Hospital Connectivity and Session Insight are focused on analysing an specific device connection, while these two proposals are meant for a whole network

    • TSC conclusion: description to be reworked, conclusion next time

  • Network Traffic Analysis, supported by China Unicom.

    • Proposal to provide statistical information of the network traffic (not individual terminal connections).

    • Original Issue 128; Network Traffic Analysis template

    • Comments:

      • @Jorge Garcia Hospital API should not be restricted to private networks

      • see discussion above

    • TSC conclusion:description to be reworked, conclusion next time

  • Dynamic Predictive Connectivity Data, supported by Telefonica and DT.

    • Proposal to provide network coverage information in certain area/volume for a future period of time, allowing to predict whether network coverage will be available e.g. for a drone on certain sky sector.

    • Original Issue 163; Dynamic Predictive Connectivity Data template

    • Comments:

      • none

    • TSC conclusion: approval of TSC will be requested in vote

  • Update on consent URL API proposal:

    • I&CM (minutes) agreed in a way forward for this API proposal, actions pending on repository creation (under ICM working group).

Commonalities (@Rafal Artych )

M0

03-31

kick-off preparation

M1 (Commonalities & ICM)

04-15

ย Alpha release

  • Discussion:

    • @Herbert Damker Is there a discussion to reach a stable version within the next meta-release.

      • @Rafal Artych path to stable should be described, maybe another initial release with few changes, heading towards stable

Identity & Consent Management (@Axel Nennker )

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement/issues/275

    • @Axel Nennker reaching stable still difficult, as the current ICM definitions are a sub-set of OIDC and OAuth 2.0, some defined restrictions are under discussion

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement/pull/266
    โ€Next steps include bring ICM conclusion to TSC to ask for API approval and for repository creation (or subproject management) with ICM as parent group and clarifying release management implications in future updates.โ€

    • @Herbert Damker proposes to create an API Repository โ€œConsentInfoโ€ under supervision of the ICM working group:

      • To define API(s) which will allow API consumers to (*):

        • determine the need for Consent: Evaluates whether user Consent is necessary according to the specified parameters and relevant legal requirements.

        • get the current Consent status: If Consent is required, the API returns the current status (e.g., active, revoked, expired...) so the API Consumer can understand the current User's consent status.

        • get a Consent Capture URL: If the user has not provided the necessary Consent, the API supplies an API Provider's Consent capture URL where the user can easily complete the Consent process.

      • The repository follows the rules of API Repositories as defined in https://github.com/camaraproject/Governance/blob/main/ProjectStructureAndRoles.md

      • Maintainers of the API repository will be the maintainers defined in https://github.com/camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.MD

      • Initial code owners will be the code owners of IdentityAndConsentManagement (can be changed by the Working Group)

      • The scope of the API repository will be detailed by writing appropriate user stories

      • The name of the repository can be changed at a later point of time if the APIs are more detailed

      • This proposal replaces https://github.com/camaraproject/APIBacklog/pull/67 (New API Proposal - Consent URL API)

    • Conclusion: The decision of the TSC on the proposal will be taken in a vote

  • https://github.com/camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement/pull/268

    • Important issue to get understanding of the consequences of the current definition of CIBA in CAMARA

Any Other Business

Next Meeting

  • Next TSC Meeting will be on Thursday, March 20th, 15:00 CET

    • Main point will be the approval of the Spring25 M5

  • Specific agenda topics backlog:

    • ...

    • ...ย 

Action items

@Herbert Damker to send mail to all mailing list with general information, and specific mail to the 32 maintainers/codeowners with disabled 2FA Mar 7, 2025
@Herbert Damker Initiate a TSC vote to approve the creation of Sandbox API Repositories for โ€œIoT Network Optimizationโ€ and โ€œDynamic Predictive Connectivity Dataโ€ Mar 9, 2025
@Herbert Damker Initiate as TSC vote to approve the creation of a Sandbox API Repository for โ€œConsentInfoโ€ under the supervision of the ICM Working Group Mar 9, 2025

Related content