2024-01-23: SP-EDC Minutes

Attendees & Representation

Type @ and your name to indicate your attendance

LF Staff:

Community:

 

Name

Organisation

Present?

Name

Organisation

Present?

Cristina Santana Casillas (Chair)

Telefónica

x

Rafal Artych

DT

x

Sergio Francisco Ortiz 

Telefónica

x

Ricardo Serrano Gutierrez

Telefónica

x

Jhon Javier Lozal Luco

Telefónica

x

Fabrizio Moggio

Telecom Italia Mobile

 

Kevin Xu

5GFF/Verizon Wireless

 

Leo Chely

Cabellabs

 

Deepak Gunjal

Cap Gemini

x

Babu Narayan

Nabstract

 

Vaibhav Mehta

Nabstract

 

Uwe Rauschenbach

Nokia

 

Nicola Cadenelli

Nearby Computing

 

Randy Levensalor

Cablelabs

 

Tom Van Pelt

GSMA

x

Thomas Vits

EdgeXR

x

Kevin Smith (minutes, aka 'Kev')

5GFF/Vodafone

x

Joshua Peng

JC Drawn Mobile

 

Mourad Khanfouci

 

x

Mark Cornall 

GSMA

 

Andrew Wajs

 

x

Navdeep

DT

x

Uwe Rauschenbach

 

x

Agenda

The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

  • Roll Call

  • Action Items Review

  • Agenda Bashing

  • General Topics

    • Goal before MWC. Have an agreement on first version on LCM and Discovery APIs.

      • Confirmed we do not require a v1.0 for MWC

      • APIs should at least conform to CAMARA Commonalities and Identity & Consent management guidelines

      • ACTION: Kev to send details of the linting script , Consent requirements and Test definitions for the LCM API

    • Harmonization of concepts/items among Simple  Edge Discovery/MVP/Traffic Influence

      • Ref issue #163

      • Discussion continued on the terminology and taxonomy (zones, sites, regions, availability zones etc.) and the relationship to application providers and end users

      • The taxonomy should be conitnued in issue 163

      • Clarification on the overall concept of Discovery and Edge to be started in the GitHub repo Discussions

      • Important that whatever it is called we have an agreed/harmonised understanding of the terminology and taxonomy

      • Agreed to work on a diagram with taxonomy proposals to supplement suggestions on terminology

    • Continuation on discussion PR159 With User stories

      • (@Sergio Francisco Ortiz @Cristina please confirm outcome of this point#?}

        • [Sergio] Pull request to be moved to discussions, and potentially include case of returning best existing app endpoint in a future version. 

    • Minor changes on MVP EdgeCloud_LcM  after approval of (PR 154)

      • Simple Edge Discovery will remain separate to LCM

    • Cleaning status of auxiliary branches

      • Kev confirmed these are now removed

  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

Action Item Review

Topic 1

  • Comments

Action items