2024-02-19 Commonalities WG Minutes
Attendees & Representation
Type @ and your name to indicate your attendance
LF Staff:
Community: @Rafal Artych, @Sachin kumar @Ming Hui Foo @Pierre Close @Jan Friman ย Murat Karabulut, Toyeeb Rehman
Agenda
The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF. |
Roll Call
Action Items Review
Agenda Bashing
General Topics
ย
Any Other Topics
Minutes
Action Item Review
ย
Housekeeping topics
Pedro Dรญez Garcรญa - new codeowner representing TEL
Results of Poll on Moving Commonalities meetings to The Linux Foundation platformย
ย
ย
Next call on 4th March will be set up on LF platform
Next Open Office Hours has been scheduled on Feb 21st at 08:00 Pacific / 17:00 CEST. ย Register with this link: https://zoom-lfx.platform.linuxfoundation.org/meeting/95532477210?password=d9756c7f-4114-4d1a-b44f-a6d6d25543c0
Release 0.3.0 has been published and announced
Merged PRs for Release 0.3.0:
Current Discussions
Centralized, generic, domain-agnostic API for event subscription and notification
New idea for Network Events pub/sub system
Topics to be covered by the next release
How to solve the dependency between Identity&Consent Management documents amd commonalities artifacts
Sim Swap Certification - 3 Legged authorization implementation
Possibly to be transferred toย IdentityAndConsentManagement subproject
PRs review
PR #120 Update CAMARA_common.yaml: add Device headers, fix address
Final review expected
PR #143 Update Design Guidelines with character set guidance
Please review
Issues review
Issue "Good reason to upgrade to openapi 3.1.x ?" - was converted to discussion
Issue #76 Clarification need for linting response severity
Proposed to be closedย
Comment on rules severity will be added
Issue #77 Mandatory Response Headers - agreed to be closed
Issue #122 Proposal to add a standard for defining durations for API Design guidelines
potentially API Design Guidelines section 11.5 can extended to address it and issue #93
Issue #113 Guidance on error responses - are error messages standardized or can they be custom?
The original question was whether the message field in error response can be custom (i.e. in other language)ย or should be exactly the same as defined in specification
the possible solution with additional error cause was indicated in the earlier discussion
the proposed approach assumes that message field can be customized
Issue #133 Adopt RFC 9457 error response format
new edit added to the issue description clarifying proposed approach
due to limited attendance no new views were captured
TSC proposes to prepare clear proposal for new response format guidelines
it should be ready before the next TSC on 7th of Marchย
ย it can be prepared in off-line mode - as a new PR if there are volunteers
the final decision should be taken in the next Commonalities meeting
Slide deck for review on March 4, 2024:ย 20240304-CAMARA-Issue 133 - RFC 9457 URN Option.pdf
AOB
The next meeting is on Mar 4th 2024 using https://zoom-lfx.platform.linuxfoundation.org/meeting/91016460698?password=d031b0e3-8d49-49ae-958f-af3213b1e547