2024-05-16 TSC Minutes
Attendees & Representation
TSC Members may indicate their attendance by marking an X in the column to the right.
Community members may use @name tag to mark their attendance below the table.
Representative | Organization | Role |
|
---|---|---|---|
@Herbert Damker | Deutsche Telekom AG | TSC Chair, Active Maintainer | x |
@Shilpa Padgaonkar | Deutsche Telekom AG | Active Maintainer |
|
@Jan Friman | Ericsson | Active Maintainer | x |
@Toshi Wakayama | KDDI | Active Maintainer | x |
@Ludovic Robert | Orange | TSC Deputy Chair, Active Maintainer | x |
@Adnan Saleem | Radisys | EUC Representative | x |
@Doug Makishima | Summit Tech | EUC Representative | x |
@diego.gonzalezmartinez | Telefonica | Active Maintainer | x |
@Jose Luis Urien Pinedo | Telefónica | Active Maintainer | x |
@Mahesh Chapalamadugu | Verizon | EUC Representative |
|
@Eric Murray | Vodafone | TSC Deputy Chair | x |
@Kevin Smith | Vodafone | Active Maintainer | x |
@Chris Howell | Vonage | Active Maintainer |
|
George Glass | TM Forum | TM Forum Representative | x |
@Olta Vangjeli | TM Forum | TM Forum Representative | x |
@Henry Calvert | GSMA | GSMA Representative | x |
@Mark Cornall | GSMA | GSMA Representative | x |
@Ramit Chawla | Airtel | Active Maintainer |
|
LF Staff: @Evan Harrison @Casey Cain
Community: @Axel Nennker @Pierre Close @Yacine Kheddache @Rafal Artych @Tanja de Groot @G. Murat Karabulut @Lyle Bertz @Yacine Kheddache
@Ali Gilani @Ricardo Serrano Gutierrez @Jorge Garcia Hospital
Agenda
The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF. |
Review and approval of previous meeting minutes
General Topics
Governance & project management issues
API Backlog
Commonalities
Identity & Consent Management
Release Management
Specific Topics
Update on Sub Project Lifecycle proposal
Update from TM Forum collaboration and how members are working in Catalysts and Operate APIs
Any Other Topics
Minutes
Review and approval of previous meeting minutes
Minutes of previous TSC meeting: 2024-05-02 TSC Minutes
No comments - draft mention removed.
Action Item Review
For the list of open action items go to home page of Technical Steering Committee)
No comment
Governance & Project Management issues
EasyCLA vs DCO Update (@Casey Cain)
Ready to be sent out independently and ready for board approval.
New way to manage Maintainers of Sub project in teams and as members of github.com/camaraproject (@Herbert Damker )
Update: Teams created, updates and review of MAINTAINERS.md files will be done one by one (see Governance/issues/134)
Update of README.md structure in all sub projects
Template aligned and updated, update within Sub Projects be done within part of them
Update of Wiki pages (which will show the README.md files inline) in work
Change Working Groups into Sub Projects
Almost done, about 9 pull request of APIBacklog need to be get closed within the old WorkingGroups repo
Provide a user-friendly snapshot for CAMARA users and developers
Will be partly covered of Release Management, see API release trackers
API Backlog (@Ricardo Serrano Gutierrez )
Initial content:
New API Proposals (see https://lists.camaraproject.org/g/tsc/message/183)
VerifiedCaller
This new subproject has been approved and is ready to be created
Tenure
Separate repo to be created within the KnowYourCustomer use case.
@Toshi Wakayama wants to verify with the KnowYourCustomer members to see if it is OK to have Tenure API as part of KnowYourCustomer family. If any changes need to be made the team will follow up accordingly.
Discussion on the API objectives: "long term" info (this line is 14 years old) vs "short term" check (this line is older than 60 days)
Commonalities (@Rafal Artych )
Initial content:
Release 0.4.0 scope: Comment in Issue #175
Dedicated call on 16/05 presented enhancements for Test Definitions Guidelines
Request to Camara members to review: https://github.com/camaraproject/Commonalities/pull/203
Request to Camara members to review the subscriptions PRs:
Reactivated discussion in Revise the device object definition to simplify it issue
Discussion:
There is an issue of compatibility when using multiple identifiers that needs to be addressed
Needs a dedicated meeting involving ICM & Commonalities team. Telefonica team will set up this (@diego.gonzalezmartinez )
Identity & Consent Management (@Axel Nennker )
Initial content:
PR #121 with initial version of "CAMARA Security and Interoperability Profile" is merged.
Scope definition for v0.2 available in IdentityAndConsentManagement/issues/146
PR #155
CAMARA-API-access-and-user-consent.md
alignment with last decisions made in profilePropose Sebastien Dewet as additional codeowner and maintainer
Discussion:
@Sébastien Dewet from Orange is candidate to be the 'third' codeowner of this project
OK from @Herbert Damker from DT & Telefonica approved the PR
Release Management (@Tanja de Groot @Samuel Adeyemo )
Initial content:
Updated API-Readiness-Checklist PR available for review: Add API-Readiness-Checklist.md to RM project (#29)
Progress of meta-release plan: Meta-release Fall24
M1 shifted to latest end of May; M2 kept on 15/06
Scope issue links have been added to the meta-release plan. Commonalities and ICM may have to prioritize the closing of main functional/technical issues or decide to move to next meta-release in order to reach an alpha release by 05-31.
Release Management issues list nearing completion: see 2024-05-07 Release WG Minutes
Discussion:
No comments
Update on Sub Project Lifecycle proposal (@Herbert Damker )
Initial content: Herbert reminded the maturity 4-steps cycle then proposed CAMARA API sub project lifecycle: API Proposal → Sandbox API → Incubated API → graduated (to be defined later)
See slide deck presented:
Recommend opening an issue to discuss the following question further:
Question on Sandbox version shift & meta release: should not be correlated?for Incubated API a new version should be in a meta-release? 6 months time could be too long for some sandbox API?
Discussion
To be continued offline (for Sandbox/Incubated and criteria within https://github.com/camaraproject/Governance/issues/129
Update from TMForum collaboration and how members are working in Catalysts and Operate APIs (@Olta Vangjeli ) - 20 mins
Slides presented by @Olta Vangjeli:
Bilateral direction to build common UC & collaborate
CAMARA → TMF: We have the user stories in API that can provide "food for thought" for larger UC
TMF → Outputs from TMF autonomous network work could be a source to new CAMARA apis (or improvement of existing API)
Let's continue the discussion...
Any Other Business
No other topic.
Next Meeting
Next TSC Meeting will be on June 6th at 10:00 CEST / 08:00 UTC / 01:00 PST